Good morning. It is a sixmonth agreement designed to make it more difficult for iran to turn its Nuclear Stockpiles into weapons. In exchange for lifting economic sanctions meant to hurt that country. This deal is being called plus oneby the p5 nations. Others are calling this a bad agreement. Morning november 24. We will begin with your calls and comments in more details on the short term Nuclear Agreement with iran. The area code is 202 in washington dc. Benjamin netanyahu it says israel is not bound by the deal and reserves the right to defend itself. This is a headline this morning om the Los Angeles Times what is the p5 plus one nations from wall street journal this from senator marco rubio, saying this agreement makes a nuclear iran more likely. He went on to say theres now an even more urgent need for congress to increase sanctions until iran completely abandons its enrichment and reprocessing capabilities. Again, those details from wall street journal. A rare address from the w
A senator mr. President . The presiding officer the senator from pennsylvania. Mr. Casey mr. President , i ask that the quorum call be vitiated. The presiding officer without objection. Mr. Casey thank you, mr. President. Mr. President , i rise today on the day when we are ever hopeful that well be able to complete legislation tonight that will remove the threat of a default as well as to open up the government and to allow us to go forward now with negotiations on shortterm budget issues for the next year and even beyond that. So were im confident that that will happen, well be able to complete most or all of the work tonight. But i think in a larger sense why its vitally important we get this agreement effectuated is because there are an awful lot of people throughout that have been hurting. Hurting for several reasons. Weve had a recovering economy but job growth hasnt moved fast enough, we still have by way of example in pennsylvania over half a Million People out of work at last c
Administration giving people 6 more weeks with us to talk about latest development. Dr. Gottlieb. And business law attorney seth. Dr. Scott, i start with you, this is an amazing story that president promises we can keep our Health Insurance coverage knowing that likelihood is 47 to 60 would close their coverage each year, millions of americans without coverage, he promised us the opposite. What do you make of this . This is an irs bulle but bottom line is that i think they were anticipating the people would lose their coverage, and move into the exchanges. These are most lo lucrative, i suspect they would move on to plans they would like more, were finding right now options are worse than they should in costs and benefit design. Weve seen people say, they see increased costs but Administration Reporting that young people, individuals will see costs on their policies of just 50 a month, i have to tell you, i have not seen that in talking with anybody on our show. What do you think of th
Going on in the United States. There are many people representing here coming from the shale gas revolution and so forth. What is the potential for American Growth in general and manufacturing in particular from this Energy Revolution interview . In your view . When you dont cheat because you cant achieve, it is sad. When you dont achieve because you wont achieve, it is tragic. That is the way to think about this. Possibility ofhe exporting natural gas, if we open up the pie more fully, we open up the possibility of exporting crude oil, if we regulate strongly and soundly quickly,decisively and we have the potential to change the American Economy and the world. We have the potential, there is no question, within the next decade for america to have the kind of influence in the world because of its ability to export fossil fuels that saudi arabia has had for the last several decades. Think about what that means for our influence in the world. Think about what that means for our capacity
There are, of course, speculations and from the arm from their own point of view there are pluses and minuses what they would do, partly in their relations with china. And so somebody in north korea or some group is thinking about the strategic and tactical implications of whatever they do, and they obviously have some kind of a roadmap which they are going to follow through. But the problem is that, short of complete turnaround by china, even though china is gradually inching towards putting more pressure on north korea, i think our reaction at the u. N. Or other collective reaction, or individual reaction, would not be much more than the usual drill that we have to. Im sorry. Let me just make one comment about the test. We placed enormous importance to the fact of testing. We think as if it is by testing north korea comes to have this big Nuclear Weapon that they did not have before or something. But that tends to mislead ourselves to think that by preventing them from the fourth tes