Points, as investors ran from equiti and towards the safety of government bonds and gold. A weak reading on trade out of china reawakened concerns that slower globa growth may be at hand. Just as the federal reser consids an Interest Rate hike later this year. There is also the issue of earnings which as we reported, did not get off to a great start yesterda t then midday, oil moved higher, and investors shook off growth, Interest Rate, and profit concerns. And just like that, the losses repaired. The y finished with the dow jo losing 45 points to 18,098. The nasdaq was off 25. And the s p fell six. Lets turn to david leibovz to talk more about the market and whether we can expect more volatility. Hes global strategist at jpmorg asset management. David, welcome, good to have you with us. Is this a time between now and lets say the election, now and year end, when we should be o i t investors should prepared for a little more volatili. Obviously the next couple of weeks, if the politica
Points, as investors ran from equiti and towards the safety of government bonds and gold. A weak reading on trade out of china reawakened concerns that slower globa growth may be at hand. Just as the federal reser consids an Interest Rate hike later this year. There is also the issue of earnings which as we reported, did not get off to a great start yesterda t then midday, oil moved higher, and investors shook off growth, Interest Rate, and profit concerns. And just like that, the losses repaired. The y finished with the dow jo losing 45 points to 18,098. The nasdaq was off 25. And the s p fell six. Lets turn to david leibovz to talk more about the market and whether we can expect more volatility. Hes global strategist at jpmorg asset management. David, welcome, good to have you with us. Is this a time between now and lets say the election, now and year end, when we should be o i t investors should prepared for a little more volatili. Obviously the next couple of weeks, if the politica
Building do think the june 16 version with those other versions go meet use of materials breaking it up etc. , can actually work . As context because width no. I dont think subject i believe the challenges the department choses and the discussions i had denied informal off the record discussions just about architecture with some other people in the Department Just deal with on detail and emphasis which is less than emphatic than what we see you. It does not have to be as aggressive or loud of building as it is. There are good parts about it when you put them into a large of a quantity they become overbearing. He. One last question. Because we have two commissioners that were at the june 1626 it is her building in the city that reminds you of the building i could reference because look at this on these little a. 5 x 11 is hard for me. I really dont like the september version. Is everything we dont want it to be. There is one building, if the building of similar scale. We have no buildin
Building do think the june 16 version with those other versions go meet use of materials breaking it up etc. , can actually work . As context because width no. I dont think subject i believe the challenges the department choses and the discussions i had denied informal off the record discussions just about architecture with some other people in the Department Just deal with on detail and emphasis which is less than emphatic than what we see you. It does not have to be as aggressive or loud of building as it is. There are good parts about it when you put them into a large of a quantity they become overbearing. He. One last question. Because we have two commissioners that were at the june 1626 it is her building in the city that reminds you of the building i could reference because look at this on these little a. 5 x 11 is hard for me. I really dont like the september version. Is everything we dont want it to be. There is one building, if the building of similar scale. We have no buildin
Building do think the june 16 version with those other versions go meet use of materials breaking it up etc. , can actually work . As context because width no. I dont think subject i believe the challenges the department choses and the discussions i had denied informal off the record discussions just about architecture with some other people in the Department Just deal with on detail and emphasis which is less than emphatic than what we see you. It does not have to be as aggressive or loud of building as it is. There are good parts about it when you put them into a large of a quantity they become overbearing. He. One last question. Because we have two commissioners that were at the june 1626 it is her building in the city that reminds you of the building i could reference because look at this on these little a. 5 x 11 is hard for me. I really dont like the september version. Is everything we dont want it to be. There is one building, if the building of similar scale. We have no buildin