son savagely a certain savagely murdered. a son savagely murdered. a lawyer from a respected son savagely murdered. a lawyer from a respected family who has control justice a respected family who has control justice in a respected family who has control justice in this community for over a century justice in this community for over a century a justice in this community for over a century. a person whose grandfather s portrait hangs at the back of grandfather s portrait hangs at the back of the courthouse, that i had to have back of the courthouse, that i had to have ordered removed in order to ensure to have ordered removed in order to ensure that to have ordered removed in order to ensure that a fair trial was hard by both the ensure that a fair trial was hard by both the state and the defence. and i both the state and the defence. and i have both the state and the defence. and i have sat both the state and the defence. and i have sat through the trial, not
the grand jury room, but not necessarily in a public filing like this, are a public report that gets put out. my guess is at the end of the day, you have to find that those people that challenge the subpoenas, filed frivolous claims of privilege, and other things to keep from having to testify before a grand jury, again, you ll find some correlation likely between those names in the people of the grand jury or thought polluting less than forthcoming, less than candid with them. one of those names that appears and bright lights is that of senator lindsey graham. who we already know that there is a disagreement between two people in including him involved in a central part of this scheme. the secretary state of georgia, brad raffensperger says that senator graham asked him to eject votes. senator graham says, he did not. assuming they both said the same thing to the ground jury, that means that one of them is lying. am i doing the math wrong here? no, we are doing it.
not. assuming they both said the same thing to the ground jury, that means that one of them is lying. am i doing the math wrong here? no, we are doing it. right and the problem for senator graham is that secretary raffensperger laid it really secretive about it, what happened was he went public, and made some public comments about how he felt about the call. and when he thought the purpose of the call was. so, those contemporaneous statements at the time are gonna come down to bite senator graham if in fact he s one of the people that the grand jury was talking about. but remember, this is just a report it s almost like a recommendation to the da that you can take, she can reject the whole thing, put in a file drawer another look at it before this does not mean that she will move forward with charges. it means that there s a grand jury hearing, who felt like
appreciate talking to you though. i wish we didn t have to under the circumstances. breaking news tonight in the mar-a-lago documents case. cnn has learned that federal prosecutors are asking court to compel one of the former presidential lawyers, evan corcoran, to talk in despite of attorney client privilege. their argument that the present might of you zoom in furtherance of a crime, which would negate the attorney-client privilege. the very latest now from kaitlan collins, elie koenig, cnn analysis and former prosecutor. so, caitlin what are prosecutors asking for here? basically, they want to talk to evan corcoran again. he s one of trump s top attorneys. he s already actually spoken to the grand jury. he did so for about four hours recently, i am told, in addition to two other trump attorneys. but i want to speak to him. again so, they have this motion to compel further testimony from evan corcoran. and the reason that it matters is they re trying to overcome that shield of atto
14 Qualify As CEA Show Judges & Stewards bernews.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from bernews.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.