and rudy giuliani were subpoenaed to testify by the fulton county district attorney in georgia. about their involvement in trump s scheme to overturn the election results in that state. the da also subpoenaed three other lawyers, whose names you may remember from the january six hearings, jenna alice, clara mitchell, and kenneth chesebro, all of them appear before the special grand jury in fulton county. at the same, time those subpoenas also subpoenaed senator lindsey graham. again, related to his involvement in that scheme. for context, ten days after the 2020 election senator graham placed a phone call to georgia secretary of state, brad raffensperger. the georgia secretary of state told the washington post at the time, he was stunned by graham s request to toss out huge swath of legally cast ballots. but a few days later, senator graham denied he d ever said such a thing, instead he said that he wanted to talk about the process for future elections. did you or did yo
and we did chili on the were subpoenaed to testify by the fulton county district attorney in georgia, about their involvement in trump s scheme to overturn the election results in that state. the da also subpoenaed three other lawyers whose names you may remember from the january 6th hearings. journalistically, -dimensional, and kenneth just burrow. all of them appeared before the special grand jury in fulton county. at the same time, those subpoenas went out, the fulton county da also subpoenaed senator lindsey graham. again, related to his involvement in that scheme. for context, ten days after the 2020 election senator graham placed a phone call to georgia secretary of state, brad raffensperger. the georgia secretary of state told the washington post at the time, he was stunned by graham s request to toss out huge swath of legally cast ballots. but a few days later, senator graham denied he d ever said such a thing, instead he said that he wanted to talk about the process
You have to your point, to both of your points. You have the physical evidence meaning the documentation, the text messages, the signed checks. You have all of the corroborating witnesses, david pecker, and now you have Michael Cohen. Is this proof beyond a reasonable doubt . Well figure that out eventually, but its all pointing in the right direction. What more do they need from Michael Cohen . Theyre going to need that direct evidence that he acted in furtherance of donald trump i think theyre going to be able to do that well with sounds like the prosecution is really doing a great job laying out the calculated narrative through Michael Cohen but then also corroborating it in a meticulous manner with the text messages. There was an objection but it was overruled. This conversation that cohen was testified to is supported by the documentary evidence. When they get to Stormy Daniels theyre going to be able to show the checks, the ledgers, all of that stuff. I think theyre doing a reall
right and the problem for senator graham is that secretary raffensperger laid it really secretive about it, what happened was he went public, and made some public comments about how he felt about the call. and when he thought the purpose of the call was. so, those contemporaneous statements at the time are gonna come down to bite senator graham if in fact he s one of the people that the grand jury was talking about. but remember, this is just a report it s almost like a recommendation to the da that you can take, she can reject the whole thing, put in a file drawer another look at it before this does not mean that she will move forward with charges. it means that there s a grand jury hearing, who felt like they weren t get the full story. so, time will tell if she wants to bring a privy charge, will have to play forward with other likely defendants in the case. and she may decide that that s enough. we ll see.