because i want him to, succeeded because it s bette for someone like that to succeed, then some of thes other maga leaning candidates, i think it s better fo democracy, do i think th republican party is going to correct its course anytime soon, absolutely not, we saw this. we re there supporting someone who just got indicted. they re out there underminin the ground jury up their american peers that s what they re doing. attacking americans. who sat there, looked at the evidence, look at the facts an made the decision. and they re out ther supporting someone who shoul be held to account he broke the law michael cohen has served thi time for breaking the law. and campaign finance what he did for trump went to jail, served his time. for exactly the same thing campaign finance breaking that law, again in the inner circle of trump , so is that the republica party is now, they re holdin
i think this is maybe the biggest development of the week. although it s kind of the executive privilege line, close second. and that is the federal judge and the appellate court said, that in the conversations with trump that are sacrosanct. between a lawyer, and his clients. we have evidence about a crime was committed. if not by evan corcoran, he s testifying the ground jury. so who does that leave? and of course, the courts found. that, it shocking. and he was in testifying for several hours today. that he had taken the fifth amendment in. their which might suggest he had some criminal exposure. he wouldn t it would ve taken three. hours he went in and testified about what we believe to be. the evidence about what s search was conducted. because he had conversations with the doj about what had been searched. and how it was searched. and how the recording was done,
i need task, your cranberry member and you see the amount of violence in the air, if not actually executed. does this have a chilling effect on the ground jury. i would assume, if you re a layperson, that s been called to be on the grand jury, that this kind of rhetoric is terrifying, it s terrifying for the prosecutor, what kind of real world effect does it have on the case itself do you think, if any? it has a potential real effect on the case. it s one of the reasons why we re seeing trump and his allies get out ahead of the potential indictment. to try and influence the grandeurs, to try and influence potential teachers who might hear the evidence and a guilt stance, down the road, and also obviously, for trump s purposes to fund-raise, and to rally his base ahead of a presidential campaign. there was a broad expectation, partially because of the harming of trump, invited to testify with a grand jury in his announcement that he was gonna be arrested this. make that this is al
i thought i knew all the evidence that the ground witnesses under subpoena, the pieces of evidence lined up. and then grand jury said, we want to see another piece of evidence more, or different. and that s part of why the timing here, the idea that trump would know that he was gonna be indicted on a particular day. it s preposterous. and maybe i guess, do you think it s a foregone conclusion that an indictment is eminent? no, i do not. no. we cannot know. the only people who know are the grand jury members themselves. they may not have yet taken about. but it doesn t matter to trump. i need task, your cranberry i need to ask, you re a grand member and you see the amount of violence in the air, if not actually executed. does this have a chilling effect on the ground jury. i would assume, if you re a layperson, that s been called to be on the grand jury, that this kind of rhetoric is terrifying, it s
kind of national issue. it s not here to overthrow the election to try to shield the discussions from disclosures. and the constitution that he s making about the, versus the legislator and congressi.at noty the dame for it either. michael, is there a world in which a narrowly subscribe set of conversations that pans has in the context of him being a president of the senate. that are off limits. everything else, including conversations that happened in the oval office there s nothing to do with his ministirial role, those aren t off limits, in other words there s some version of this resolution where he gets to hat the speaking of a boston era set of conversations but the important conference the most relevant conversation is very much on the table as far as conversations from the ground jury.