states we are going to show you them shaded in purple on a map that the pro-choice gutmacher institute says are certain or likely to ban abortion based on currently in books or transient states but that is just the effect today of the supreme court s 5-4 decision. what happens tomorrow and months and years from this moment? that, we don t know. in fact, many democrats tonight are expressing concern that the decision could provide legal justification to overturn other rights, secured by supreme court precedent. including those covering contraception and same-sex marriage. and they have reason to be concerned after justice clarence thomas suggesting doing just that today as well. this is what justice thomas wrote in a concurring opinion, quote, for that reason? future case, we should reconsider all of this court s substantive due process precedence, including griswold lawrence, and obergefell. he continues because any due process decision is demonstrably erroneous. we have a duty to de
i think we re essentially back where we were in 1973 because the judges concluded that the right to abortion was not in the constitution. it isn t. the roe v. wade decision was flooded many ways including that it wasn t in the constitution. it was never defined in the viability question. the privacy argument was very. week i guess that really says that both sides, then, need to mobilize and get their side out in big numbers. tim, i know you wrote an opinion piece entitled for conservatives saying, it s just a pit stop justice clarence thomas i ve mentioned, he writes a concurring opinion that the supreme court should reconsider griswold lawrence and obergefell, rulings that protect contraception, same sex