The Australian market saw a slight downturn in job growth in the period between October to December 2021, as the COVID-19 Omicron variant spread acros.
because when pat cipalone says she has absolute immunity and she should not set foot in that hearing room, hope hicks has defied that. they re going in there and they re going to begin testifying, so i think this is something of a loosening of the grip the president has thus far had on these witnesses. greg, do you agree with that? just because hope hicks is walking into the building doesn t mean she ll say anything. we rarely hear from hope hicks, but she did an interview with forbes just before the president took office in 2017 and i want to share what she said. on the politics of watching are two different things. so i think now being a novice is much more jarring to me than being a novice on a campaign, because there are so many people new to it, they re also trying to figure everything out as it comes to you. whether you know it or have experience in it or not. fashion pr. that s what hope hicks did before she joined the campaign.
seat for every major event of trump s campaign and presidency right up until she left the white house last year. while she doesn t work for trump anymore, she s not far off. she works directly for locklan murdoch who runs the fox corporation who, of course, runs fox news. hicks showed up last year in the mueller report more than 180 times. and like myself, along with many other democrats have tried to question, she has agreed to testify. now, what she actually tells them is an entirely different issue. dennis kirschner, greg savage and the officer of congressional affairs. glen, even if hope hicks is testifying today, we know that white house counsel pat cipalone
now, if hope hicks has incriminating information to offer about the president, that could be viewed as obstruction of justice by the president. greg, can the president instruct hope hicks, a private citizen? she s not his personal lawyer, and while he has not asserted executive privilege yet, if he does that, is it game over and we re getting nothing? that could be the practical effect in the near term, but legally it s hard to imagine how that sort of blanket assertion of executive privilege could last long-term and protect or prevent her from testifying forever. as i ve been saying throughout this process, the president really can t have it both ways. he can t, in effect, be immune from criminal prosecution according to the department of justice opinion, office of legal counsel opinions, and at the same time thwart congress in its