unnamed foreign government said they were having suspicions tamerian tsarnaev might have extremist ties. but the fbi found nothing. so they closed the case. then they apparently told this unnamed foreign government about the lackf extremist information that came in came up in their search. and they told this government that if they had any more concerns about thisan, tamerian tsarnaev, suspect number 1 or the man in the black hat, they should call bak, tell the fbi again. and the fbi would look again. but the foreign government, initially concerned 2 years ago about possible extremist ties never called back. very interesting information about one of the brothers. peter doocy, live in washington. peter, thank you. a member of the house committee on intelligence congressman adam shiv has been monitoring the situation, also a former federal prosecutor. so he understands how the investigation may unfold. what s the next step?
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20130420:05:07:00
comparemela.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from comparemela.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
he is live in his district in california. it s good to see you. good to see you, gregg. without compromising any classified information or national security, can you share any information about the suspected terrorists? well, i cel tl you what is probably going on right now behind closed doors. that is, there must be an intensive conversation between law enforcement and the intelligence community about how to handle this suspect, once he emerges from surgery and is stable enough to talk to i don t know what kind of interview they may have been able to conduct before heen into the operating room. but heas h not yet been mirandized, there is a public safety exception they are using and appropriately so. but that s limit of duration to allow law enforcement to gather information to protect the public. goes back to a case in new york, where they apprehended an armed suspect in a grocery store and the weapon wasn t on him and
interrogation, a lengthy one without limits could be undertaken. would you agree with that? i know, i think it s hard to judge from a distance, without greater information. so, no, i wouldn t be calling to treat him as an enemy combatant without more information. the consequence is, you treat him like an enemy combatant, you may have a longer interview that may or may not give you better information than if you mirandize him. but it poses a real problem, in terms of prosecutes him and bringing him to judge. the courts have had a better track record than the military commissions, many of which have been overturned on appeal or have stagnated. the priority is to get the best information. at the same time that this interview group is brainstorming over that, all the other intelligence communities are poring through just what you have been talking about, the contact by a prior government.