digging in his heels. he remained singularly focused on the electoral challenge, and had blinders on to everything else. almost-every stage of the panicked response, and everybody s push to get him to understand the urgency here, prompted the same reactions from him. denial. this wasn t on him. he couldn t control what people did. why couldn t his people protest? it was mostly antifa. begrudging capitulation. he shouldn t be blamed. but okay. he d say something. fighting back. why should he say anything? people were upset. the election had been stolen from him and them. by 3:30 p.m., he was telling callers that, yes, he had decided to say something. a video became the plan. the safest sort of statement with everyone in agreement. the president couldn t go live. but back in his overcoat out on the portico even with his script in hand, he mostly defaulted to
judge, so what else are you going to get? the president is right. his record has not been good in the ninth circuit on the travel ban and lots of other issues. shopping for a forum where you think you might get a favorable rule, however, is something that people on both sides of the political spectrum do. so setting all that aside, i think what makes this interesting and newsworthy is the fact that the chief justice after hearing lots of comments from donald trump about judges decided today was the day to respond. but the attack wasn t on him. right? that s interesting. correct. he was talking about judges. he was sort of speaking on behalf of all the judges who probably don t have the same security as the chief justice of the supreme court to take on the president. well, true. he now, donald trump has criticized john roberts in the past during the campaign he was critical of john roberts for casting a vote in favor of
annie something s message has been clear to remain calm don t make one unjustice to another unjustice through civil unrest. i want to talk about the case a little more. in his ruling the st. louis circumstance the judge wilson said this, the court observes based on its nearly 30 years on the bench that a urban her win dealer not in possession of a firearm would be a anomaly. earlier i refuse today give a reaction but after talking to miss smith today she asked me to say something. i don t think it was ever established that mr. shigt was a her win dealer. i understand her oe win found in the vehicle but that doesn t make you a dealer. the second part is that the possession of this weapon, it wasn t on him. it was allegedly in the car, stuffed in between the seats
i search for any items that a charity had named in trump s honor and came up with a theater seat in new jersey. a seat in florida. trump s list of presidential achievements so fares looks like the policy equivalent of two theater seats and a park bench. so, i mean, if that s how he operated as a private citizen, it doesn t seem like that s going to change how he operates now. it s possible. it s possibly true. one thing i saw when looking at his donations, when the spotlight wasn t on him, where did he actually give his money? it wasn t like a lot of wealthy people that choose a cancer charity or hospital and devote enough money to that particular cause that he would help it in a material way but also they would honor him by naming something after him. friends being honored by some charity, he ll give a little money. he buys a table for $10,000. he spreads the money so widely, there s not much impact in a philanthropic sense and no monument to what he s done. it s not money, it s tim
charity had named in trump s honor and came up with a theater seat in new jersey. a seat in florida. trump s list of presidential achievements so fares looks like the policy equivalent of two theater seats and a park bench. so, i mean, if that s how he operated as a private citizen, it doesn t seem like that s going to change how he operates now. it s possible. it s possibly true. one thing i saw when looking at his donations, when the spotlight wasn t on him, where did he actually give his money? it wasn t like a lot of wealthy people that choose a cancer charity or hospital and devote enough money to that particular cause that he would help it in a material way but also they would honor him by naming something after him. friends being honored by some charity, he ll give a little money. he buys a table for $10,000. he spreads the money so widely,