the one that facilitated the summit between kim jong-un and president trump. what kind of questions will you be asking? there seems to be this idea we ll succeed fast/fail fast with denuclearization. the question is how long will it take to know whether we re succeeding or failing? if we re succeeding we need to know what the steps toward denuclearization are. if we re failing we need to know what steps to take to fully implement a variety of sanctions that have yet to be implemented, whether the united states or united nations or china. we have some reports that lessening of restrictions on crude oil to north korea and lowering the price of gasoline meaning sanctions may be slipping away as we speak. that s an importance we ll get. julie: how optimistic are you? what accountability do you expect to see with regard to north korea especially when it comes to actually going in there and making sure they hold up their end of the bargain? that s the great unknown.
and he has so much for people. and if we keep on that, then we don t have to concern ourselves too much about those who chip away from the outside. ainsley: you wrote this great book it s called there is more. i love that there has to be more because our country is so divided. i feel that more than ever. you write the great unknown. and i have always heard don t let fear stand in the way of your destiny. if you are fearful, don t let that stop from you reaching your dreams. hill song church was berthed with absolutely no guarantees. there was no promised financial support. no guarantees people would come and no certainty in faith an jesus and confidence in his calling that god would bless this brand new little outreach church. look what god has done with your church now. why did you start hill song. why did we start? we started because we cared about people. and we started in the small suburb way down under in sydney, australia. that s why the way it has gone and the global and h
illegally as children. it s not going to do a lot of things that democrats had wanted it to do. sure. but you do start to see a path forward, i think, emerge in the on the house side. the question is, are democrats, they have to have democrats on the senate side, going to vote for it. there are a lot of open questions on this right now. and only three days to go. we ll have to see what happens. you can start to see how they do it. if the depends were to gamble over daca or a lack of a shutdown deal, who gets blamed here? we re three days out. who takes the blame? that s the i guess the conventional wisdom among both parties? i think that s the great unknown. it s hard to imagine to me, it s hard to imagine the party that s not in charge of the white house, the senate, and the house getting at least some of the blame for a government shutdown. you can t just say, oh, these guys won t vote with us. if you control everything say they re to blame. on the other hand, republi
president and how he takes this on. he can, you know, he is known to be a fighter. so he has that ability to be able to just put his head down and keep working. or he can be really angry and, you know, sort of alienate both parties and nothing gets done. he ll do both. that s the great unknown right now. brian. yes, he ll do both. you ll see him get angry. you ll see him try to like he says, he s the counterpuncher. he likes to walk into a deal and punch somebody and then talk with them. i think he ll try every arrow in his quiver. it depends whether or not he s actually able to talk to anyone and see if he can work with people. if there s any indication of the trouble he s going to have working with congress, you already have members of his own party be an da it s abdicating
to the poll are citizens entitled to vote. the president is never anything like what you just said. the integrity down ballot. he is talking about his popular return and what happened there and this is not an open area of discussion where there s a great unknown. there s been studies about this and they have looked at over a billion votes congressman. it s almost exhaustively to be honest about it. they found a handful of prosecutable cases. a hand full of cases that mixed determinations. this is a fools errand and is it something we should tolerate? i look at the down ballot. that s not what he is proposing. he is talking about himself and what happened in his race and legitimacy that only the president seems to be questioning. when an illegal vote is cast for president that illegal vote is also cast for a city