Mayors office, a member of the equal housing opportunity organization, and youve got to pay 3 a month . How about the salvation army. Youve got one that comes in here, a person that i helped. While in that shelter system, he got a brandnew apartment in a complex with a swimming pool, and hes only paying 100 a month. How do you think that makes veterans feel . How do you think that makes disabled people feel . Chair fewer thank you, mra for residents, not 5. Eliminating public hearings on price increases at these places. I absolutely am not opposed to the notion of flexible pricing, negotiatable at peak demand. There may be a way to do that with parameters and at least real notice, ideally, for the public to comment before theyre set in stone. One of the reason for raising or lowering the fees as written is the weather, so my question there would be whether the fees would go up today because of foggy weather or down today because of foggy weather or up last week because of 90 days, or l
Gonch. The departments proposed 216,282,082 budget is 1. 6 less than the mayors proposed budget. Our proposed recommendations recommended reductions to the proposed budget total 368,667. Of those, 265,717 are ongoing savings and 102,950 are ongoing savings. In addition, the b. L. A. Recommended closing out unexpended encumbrances for total generated savings of 481,25 481,259. Of the 291,577 in recommended reductions, 25 our understandi is we have agreement with the rec and parks department. Chair fewer mr. Ginsberg, do we have agreement . That is correct. I do want to thank the b. L. A. , in particular, juliet wilson, who worked with my staff, and in particular, kelly kirkpatrick, and severin campbell. Item number 10 permits the department to impose flexible pricing on guest berthing fees at our marina harbor. Its 30 days or less, and prime yearly used by regional and traveling boaters throughout the year. An example of the flex pricing would be a 2 current rate going to 4, and the 4 w
Crookedest street in the world. How much you going to charge tourists to go to lombard street. Youve got them for housing. Youve got fees for residents and nonresidents. Youve got fees for renting a brandnew studio apartment. Youve got fees you cut in front of me to get an apartment, and then, you want to charge people thats born and raised and worked in San Francisco and pay taxes, and when you get an apartment, either youre paying a rate of 3,000 for the same type of apartment, but if i sneak in the United States and come in here illegally, i can get the same apartment for 3 a month, 3 a month for the first months rent, and 3 a month for the last months rent, and 3 a month for the deposit. You think thats fair . You see anything on the a. M. I. Scale to say youve got to make this much money to be a tenant thats coming out of the Mayors Office, a member of the equal housing opportunity organization, and youve got to pay 3 a month . How about the salvation army. Youve got one that come
The irs targeting of political groups. In october, chaffetz introduced legislation to impeach koskinen. Without objection the chair is authorized to declare recess of the committee at any time. We welcome everyone to the hearing on examining allegations of misconduct on irs commissioner John Koskinen part one. I begin with myself. The constitution sets forth a system of checks and balances and grants each branch of government tools to shake sure no one gets too much power. The power to write the laws, power of the purse, impeachment power and other powers. They allow congress to expert oversight over branches including rooting up corruption, fraud and abuse by government officials and taking further disciplinary action on behalf of the American People when warranted. The duty to serve as a check on the other branches including against corruption and abuse is a solemn one and congress does not and must not take this responsibility lightly. That is why this committee scheduled a hearing
With great aplum and not even worry aplomb and not even worry about it this doesnt save us the 340 billion which is what we ought to do, what this amendment does is say, dont spend it on further constructing his useless well, not useless but totally expensive facility, dont waste the money on this boondoggle. And we can spend the money on maybe what the department of energy thinks we ought to do, to dilute and dispose. Or maybe build a fast reactor, which weve had in the past and which russia is using to dispose of their plutonium. Theyre Generating Energy and doing so while getting rid of their unused plutonium. So why dont we just accept this amendment and eliminate thE Construction clause, keep the 340 million in South Carolina so they can be happy, maybe they can spend it on something that might actually work. I reserve the balance of my time. The chair the gentleman eserves. For what purpose does the gentleman from South Carolina seek recognition . Im in opposition and yield mysel