they have 3,335 beds and at a rate of about 420 people families crossing the border every day. they would fill up in eight days. where do they go? what is the defense department s responsibili in all of this and are they going to be kept in humane conditions because the flores settlement in the 90s was about addressing that exact question, what conditions are good muff for children. it was determined under the obama administration when they went back and revisited that agreement that very little conditions are suitable for children and certainly not those that last over 20 days. so a lot of questions to come. i hope that we don t i know you don t. i hope we don t leave the story behind and assume all the problems are solved because of this executive order today. right. jacob. so i ve been reaching out to hhs. they said this grandfathering issue is up to dhs. so i was texting earlier and i said are the kids going to be grandfathered, anything? check our tweeted statement they
now are almost at capacity. they have 3,335 beds and at a rate of about 420 people families crossing the border every day. they would fill up in eight days. where do they go? what is the defense department s ren all of this and are they going to be kept in humane conditions because the flores settlement in the 90s was about addressing that exact question, what conditions are good muff for children. it was determined under the obama administration when they went back and revisited that agreement that very little conditions are suitable for children and certainly not those that last over 20 days. so a lot of questions to come. i hope that we don t i know you don t. i hope we don t leave the story behind and assume all the problems are solved because of this executive order today. right. jacob. so i ve been reaching out to hhs. they said this grandfathering issue is up to dhs. so i was texting earlier and i said are the kids going to be grandfathered, anything?
this property you have and are giving you no compensation for it and equal protection violation because it treats some classes of people differently than others and provides no basis in that regard so this is a serious lawsuit as it goes up on appeal. a lot of folks are concerned there is no grandfathering. there would be a lawsuit of all purchases going forward i have a feeling but in this case giving you several options including turning in what you have to law enforcement. do you think that part of this law withstand constitutional scrutiny? something a lot of people would argue feels like confiscation. certainly, absolutely. we have talked about circuit courts. we need to hear from the supreme court just like in the heller case which says the second amendment is not absolute. interesting enough in the ninth circuit case in 2014 the us supreme court had the
property you have and they re not giving you any compensation for it. it provides no reasoned basis in that regard. this is going to be a very serious lawsuit as it goes up on appeal. and a lot of folks are most concerned about the fact that there are no grandfathering. but in this case, they basically are giving you several options, including turning in what you have to law enforcement. do you think that part of this law withstands constitutional scrutiny as well? it feels like confiscation. certainly the best argument, absolutely. what we really need to hear from is the united states supreme court. the heller case said the second amendment is not absolute. interestingly enough, in the 9th circuit case in 2014, the u.s.
susan collins have concerns. collins telling jake tapper it s very difficult for me to envision a scenario where i would end up voting for this bill. i am worried whether cbo s been given enough time to thoroughly analyze the bill. reporter: the co-authors released a revised vision with one clear goal securing new support. for murkowski, there are clear benefits to alaska including a boost in federal matching funds for medicaid, as well as a grandfathering in to medicaid of native americans and alaskan native who s benefited from the program s expansion under obamacare. for conservatives like senators cruz, mike lee, and rand paul, a further loosening in how states can rid themselves of several of obamacare s key protections, all in an effort to drive premiums down. the proposal removes the need for states to apply for specific waivers from rules that require plans to cover prescription drugs, mental health, and other services. it would also allow insurers to