it s hard for me to comment about what exactly what kind of relationship they might have had. i just i just don t know. i mean, we are talking about something that allegedly happened many many, many years ago. this happens to be a case that has not been prosecuted to this level until right now, and i saw a tweet from from from nancy pelosi a couple hours ago where it talks about how donald trump has the right to prove his innocence. and that s not how this works. there is a presumption of innocence and what happens inside of a grand jury room. that isn t a situation where the defense is able to put on their case to cross examine witnesses, and the burden of proof is a lot less and you re making a decision based off of the guidance that you re getting of what the law is and what the theory is. of the prosecution, so there will be apparently a day in court to calm and what we ll see what was
policy beliefs. and i do truly believe at this point that he believes that we as a country or at civil war between red and blue, and that he is under attack. by the left, and in a sense, i think that he is becoming increasingly motivated by that not fearful, and that s what i find so frightening right now, because there is this potential that january 6th was a prelude. we have to constantly think back to and i appreciate it the very beginning of this segment that congressman zeldin called again for peaceful expressions of protest if those moments of protests come about, because donald trump certainly will not call for that, congressman, where did you hear? i thought it was a really good interview, and i m glad it was extended did a great job and it gives you a little taste of what cross examination. maybe like, uh, when you re in that grand jury room, you don t have the defense. they re putting on their case, cross examining
mr. trump the presumption of guilt, there is a trial, he gets a chance to put his evidence on. and then it goes to the jury, whether he had any political motivation waiting to right before the election, now, watching stormy daniels to go public. that will wait to see what a jury says. so, we can t know the answer, we will believe him in the jury system. michael cohen, former legal adviser robert costello, he said the grand jury at the request of donald trump s team this past week. he has said that your client is on a revenge tour. is mr. cohen seeking revenge here? given what you just said, i m interested, what if the manhattan da decides not to indict mr. trump? then what? we will respect what the case is about, with the facts are about. let s just talk about mr. costello. i can t comment to you on what happened in that grand jury room, when he testified. i can only say we came and
for accountability. you know, not only trying to secure the testimony of mike pence and he will succeed. mike pence will see the inside of a grand jury room, and he will be compelled to testify, because his attempt at asserting these privileges will fail, and then equally dramatic is jack smith s attempt to basically flip donald trump s own defense attorney, evan corcoran, against him, because it looks like, according to a finding by chief judge, merrill howell, that donald trump was using evan corcoran in furtherance of submitting crimes. so, the only remaining question, michael, is, was evan corcoran complicit in the crimes or was he being used unwittingly? if unwittingly, he has no fifth amendment right against self incrimination. if he is complicit, he will fleet plead the fifth. didn t jack smith will have a decision to make. do i even corcoran and compel him to testify about the crimes of trump or do i prosecute corcoran? so, that piece is probably
secure the testimony of mike pence and he will succeed. mike pence will see the inside of a grand jury room, and he will be compelled to testify, because his attempt at asserting these privileges will fail, and then equally dramatic is jack smith s attempt to basically flip donald trump s own defense attorney, evan corcoran, against him, because it looks like, according to a finding by chief judge, merrill howell, that donald trump was using evan corcoran in furtherance of submitting crimes. so, the only remaining question, michael, is, was evan corcoran complicit in the crimes or was he being used unwittingly? if unwittingly, he has no fifth amendment right against self incrimination.