ones terms here that yesterday a deal had been struck but but now it seems that the government is backtracking on that he does have a trump card. even that he s pushed out that will undermine the legitimacy of this government process and so someone who is desperate to cling to power as we ve seen over the last thirty seven years i don t think he s going to give up power so it may make come to the start or it may end up being a failed coup. and just how worried are you as a human rights activist about this military intervention given that this army until recently supported mugabe s regime which has been accused of huge human rights violations in the past. absolutely the major concerns
look how he managed himself on his projects. ahead of time and under budget. that s the philosophy he is bringing to the government and white house. not only do we respect the taxpayer in whether or not it is it a highering freeze or money we send in aid. we make sure the money is used well and programs are done in efficiently and effective ways. it is a whole government process. look at what he did with boeing and lockheed. on the planes. we can appreciate it down further. and the pipeline, he inserted pieces to say we negotiate further. if he can get a better deal for the american tax pay per and someone is building something to profit for, can we find a way to insure that the american taxpayer receives a benefit? that would go to the u.s.
and his projects. underbudget and either on time or ahead of time. that s the kind of philosophy he is bringing into this government and into this white house is making sure that not only do we respect tax payers and figure out whether or not we are talking about the hiring freeze or how we do business or how much money we send in aided that we make sure that the money we send is being used well, the programs that we are implementing are done in a way that are are done in the most efficient and effective ways. it is a whole of government process. it s trying to make sure look what he did with boeing and lockheed on planes. it s going in and saying we can lower that price more, we can negotiate further. it s why when steve asked about the two pipelines that he wanted to make sure he insert pieces to say we can negotiate further. if we can get a better deal out of the american taxpayer, if someone getting use of our lands or waterways they are building something they can go to profit
confirmation and effective people in place. if tillerson has hadley there and james baker picking up the phone calling john mccain saying, senator, we really need you on this one. with either hadly or kimmitt as number two, they won t vote it down. kimmitt knows the building better. this is all about coalition building as someone senior in trump world said to me the other day. they view it as world war ii. you take some people from over here and over there. you don t all have to like each other. you can all work together. david ignatius? joe, the one thing i would like to see is him reach out to a democrat or two. a lot of democrats need to be part of this government process going forward if it s going to work. also, he s got to find a way to sponsor a bipartisan examination of what russia was trying to do during our elections. if he owns that and says i m for
happened. isn t it interesting though seven months or eight months ago that was a long time ago. for the last five years, it s been bush s fault. eight months is too long ago. greg: dana, anybody will ask who pushed the video? dana: you said in the monologue it was valerie plame. you are going to be editing the talking points. they edited the facts of the community assessment to make talking points for themselves. bob: that is the number one question. if that is case. these talking points get handled by a lot of different agencies. if they altered the facts in the talking points, then somebody is in deep trouble. if they edited it as normally through a government process, they didn t want this out. they want that piece out.