men, boys, girls, flip-flops. i don t need to see your toenails. tank tops. your hairy shoulders turned no one on. spandex leggings, you are not on mine. wear them when you do laundry. without standards, who knows what we will wear next? travel like a pro, not like a hobo. as for the outrage, you can stop it, especially patricia arquette. she tweeted terror attacks are distractions from trump s russian ties. that opinion looks worse on you than a thong on bob beckel. bob: don t be so quick to judge. greg: i am going to go to the ladies first, or women. i spell it with a y. i think it s good for united. what do you say? kennedy: it s a company. this is not the government squashing someone s first
bob: picking up incidental communications. eric: no one disagrees with that bob. the intel committee can say is not going on and now we find out it was. dana: but what was going on? eric: clapper said the nsa wasn t collecting data on americans. dana: i m curious. what are you saying they lied about on monday? eric: they were asked is there an ongoing investigation going on and where they targeted? no and no. but they were and they are. dana: you don t accept that incidental collection about a different topic is not targeting and investigating them. eric: the way it was incidental because it went through the fisa court. dana: what was the original warrant about? who were they talking to? eric: if you re going to tap into an american, you have to go to the fisa court.
kimberly: bob is upset about leaks now. greg: the big picture about whether trump is vindicated, it doesn t matter if it vindicates him whole way. this is all about a tweet. a tweet in the broadest sense, doesn t have to do with him being proven correct. it is like saying you were assaulted but they only grabbed your arm. technically they are the same thing. he is saying obama was tapping me but it turns out maybe it was the administration doing some kind of incidental collecting. incidental collecting, it s like when you take a picture of your wife on vacation and behind you is some stranger picking his nose. eric: can i point out why this really does matter. we had understood this was an investigation into russian ties to the trump administration. according to devin nunes, it s not the russians. there had to be a fisa court request for surveillance. bob: an entirely different
dana: incidental collection is not an investigation about certain people. eric: nunes said this came directly from a speech one of our warrants. bob: may have been an investigation into something else. no on the russian thing. eric: no, they said there was no investigation into the trump administration ongoing. greg: the trump transition team, the people they were talking to. may not have anything to do with russia but there was something going on. it is either foreign agents or maybe it is potential criminal activity. could be something worse. bob: nunes said it was an investigation into two foreign nationals that had nothing to do with the trump campaign. kimberly: incidental collection.
brussels attacks took place that killed 32 in the airport and the subway. it was also vehicle born, a tactic they have used. isis has been asking its followers to use vehicles as weapons. it is hard to stop them, though it is very unsophisticated. if there is little you can do about it. we saw in nice, berlin, munich. there was also increased chatter before the attack took place. it was on the same day that 68 foreign ministers were meeting in d.c. to discuss the anti-isis coalition. the technique. no confirmation. bob: has anyone taken responsibility? has isis said anything about it? nothing yet. you would expect that to come out. you would expect them to take claim if it was them. if it is not directed by them, it may be inspired by them. they ask there followers to