health insurance, they lose their plans, that is how the law is designed because they re mandating government levels of coverage, mandating levels of benefits. so of course you lose your plan, that is the design, they think government knows what is best. if you lose your plan, they don t care, you had a junk plan in their eyes. our tax dollars will bail out the insurance industry, humana will get something like that $450 million. and tonight, next on hannity. everybody in cleveland, all the minority got phone he gave you a phone? he gave us a phone. if you sign up, you got low income, you disability. all right, so this president and his handouts like obama and his handouts like obama phones are responsible for
mandating government levels of coverage, mandating levels of benefits. so of course you lose your plan, that is the design, they think government knows what is best. if you lose your plan, they don t care, you had a junk plan in their eyes. our tax dollars will bail out the insurance industry, humana will get something like that $450 million. and tonight, next on hannity. everybody in cleveland, all the minority got phone he gave you a phone? he gave us a phone. if you sign up, you got low income, you disability. all right, so this president and his handouts like obama [ tires screech ]
health insurance, they lose their plans, that is how the law is designed because they re mandating government levels of coverage, mandating levels of benefits. so of course you lose your plan, that is the design, they think government knows what is best. if you lose your plan, they don t care, you had a junk plan in their eyes. our tax dollars will bail out the insurance industry, humana will get something like that $450 million. and tonight, next on hannity. everybody in cleveland, all the minority got phone he gave you a phone? he gave us a phone. if you sign up, you got low income, you disability. all right, so this president and his handouts like obama phones are responsible for the nation s growing entitlement culture, our studio audience
at best, this should be a local thing that government should fight. they can do a much better job. i say they do an even better job in the private sector through charity. the problem with the fraud is precisely because the federal government is involved. if you want to get rid of it, abolish the program. morgan, what about cutting out the federal side of this entirely, just focusing on private charities and local governments? i don t think that we should cut out the federal government entirely but it s not just the federal government contributing to this larger issue on snap spending. it s also the states that have loosened their guidelines for people who can qualify even more so than the federal government. part of the reason is because they get federal government incentives to do that. i think that s a big point to make as well. we need to see the regulations or reforms happen on both of those government levels. the other point i would make is we talk about people not being able