Policy that vancouver and new york have done. That will enhance our local seekosis tom, improve human health, mitigate climate age and i hope it will be part of your Climate Action strategy in 2020. And thank you to Anthony Valdez for all your good work. Thank you. Next item is item 11, announcements, this item is for discussion. No announcements or Public Comment. The next item is 12, new business future agenda items. Anthony valdez, this is discussion and possible action. So, commissioners, in charles absence i will do the new business today. At the january commissioner meeting, well be having the regular items which is the voting on the budget and the recommendation that comes from the operations committee. As well as voting on the annual report and the recommendation that comes from the policy committee. Theres an election of officers as well as a couple of presentations from the climate team about hazard and resiliency plans that the cities is working on. So thats what we have so
Electrifycation. File number 190708 concerning electric preferred buildings. Explanatory document resolution file no. 201909coe. Item for discussion and action. Commissioner sullivan is going to do the actual motion. Thank you. Save your voice. Great. So as commissioner sullivan can attest to, we had a really interesting policy Committee Meeting on these issues. And we wanted to ask cyndy our Climate Program manager to give you a brief outline of what was discussed not nearly in the same level of detail. But as lowell said, when you look at our where weve got emissions coming out, its pretty clear theres not a lot of mystery here. Our buildings are a big part of the story. And where those emissions are coming from, cyndy will talk a little bit about that. But more and more, they are coming from natural gas. And while we will be developing a Climate Action strategy that you will hear a lot more about for 2020, we dont wait for that to be finished before we adopt policies along the way.
I want to have the staff review this, particularly with the trust to see if this is a facility they could have approved. We have a staff member who used to work there. They reviewed it and said this would be something they would see as provable for what it is worth. It is an additional step that i wanted to at least get the answer to. They have their own guidelines, wireless telecommunication facilities or guidelines. That is what they use. I have a copy of that. One other question before we hammer on dpw. The corridor. This case reminds me when i first signed up a few years ago. I think there was a pole out in the sun set and there was a view corder requested. We denied it. It was looking rat golden gate park. Far less grand than this spectacular view which i have grown up with as a native of the city. I believe we also sited a view corridor. If this isnt in the view corder what is it . It is a good street. The issue and what it did have warrant additional review because of th of the
Issues. I want to have the staff review this, particularly with the trust to see if this is a facility they could have approved. We have a staff member who used to work there. They reviewed it and said this would be something they would see as provable for what it is worth. It is an additional step that i wanted to at least get the answer to. They have their own guidelines, wireless telecommunication facilities or guidelines. That is what they use. I have a copy of that. One other question before we hammer on dpw. The corridor. This case reminds me when i first signed up a few years ago. I think there was a pole out in the sun set and there was a view corder requested. We denied it. It was looking rat golden gate park. Far less grand than this spectacular view which i have grown up with as a native of the city. I believe we also sited a view corridor. If this isnt in the view corder what is it . It is a good street. The issue and what it did have warrant additional review because of th
Fellow commissioners with regard to the building one number of units to another number of units, that kicks in potentially higher insurance. That really again is not in our purview to consider. Thathatthat is a civil issue and between the hoa members, correct . Correct. We will hear from the department of building inspection. Good evening, commissioners. Department of building inspection. The one thing i see that might be a possible problem for the permit holder is she signed an agreement stating they wouldnt have anybody but licensed contractors. That is because it is a multiunit building. They were allowed to pull the permit as an owner. The price is a little low, too. When the building inspector goes out there he is going to ask them to make adjustments to the valuation. Is that a building inspection issue as opposed to ahoa issue . Correct. That will be noticed as far as inspection red flag goes up, new requirement. We dont have to worry about that tonight . During the course of co