sod a lot oque franf really ine and quite frankly, startling d details. et d the devilon is inal the deo and i ll trump had no basis, no reason, no legal basis to retain those documents at mart r a lago. e there could be numerous there could be numerous just donald trumadp as well as additional crimes that coulds be charged. hee getting th is she kidding me? now, she mightat be getting tht idea from one of the smalls parts of the affidavit that was curiously left unredacted likerr on page thirty . we re referring to presidentum trump and p and those around hi quote, criminal parties, but stilstl didn t provide any evidence to prove it. it also warned that t releasinthgs team the affidavit would give trump and his team the opportunity to flee t or destroy evidence stord electronically and otherwise fleed . on really, trump s plane has hisan name on itde and destroyhing electronic evidence. do they mean doing something like, i don t know, deleting lit thirty three thousa
as an attempt to overthrowtto our entire such an democratic constitutional order. it s such an interesting point. i mean, here are intting the bureaucrats of the national archives, by the way, the same people the way who put trigger s on our founding documents on the constitution and saying that they trump the president of the unitehe presid states ins of these documents. well, i thin k what the the revelation was today, you know, this is a document dispute and it laid out in detail what what was there was back and forth about whether these documents arorthe classif ,whether they re not the trumphe organization and the lawyersnot thganization and the lawyersnot not. and he declassified them. againa ,the act of raiding a formersids president s home when this coulh president s home when this coulh the documents could have been sort through a motiothron to co through some other means besides a raid. got des a raid. they felt was absolutely necessary and they went inwe kno and got the docu