media. the suspect only 21 years old, was a member of the massachusetts national guard s 10 2nd intelligence wing. fallout over the leak is continuing as many of the shared documents assuming they are legitimate reveal the depth that u.s. intelligence had penetrated russia s military. other documents contained the troop movements of russian soldiers. the leak s impact is far reaching and will, no doubt, damage u.s. interests and has immediate implications percent war in ukraine. let s bring in retired four-star general jack keane, he s chairman of the institute for the study of war and a fox news senior strategic analyst. general, welcome, good to see you again. so you ve seen a lot of leaks like this not maybe like this, but a lot of leaks of intelligence secrets in your career. how would you assess the damage of this one? how serious? yeah. i think it is pretty serious for a couple of reasons. one you mentioned, what s revealed is the fact that the united states has
lawrence, and oberfeld as well as interracial marriage. jessica schneider is with us. the court made interesting calls this morning in other cases, including ones they chose not to take up. what have we learned so far? a flurry of activity as we end the term, guys. the supreme court just a while ago issuing orders. these are decisions on which cases they will and won t take next term. notably, the court has decided not to take a case that would have revisited the standard for libel. since 1964, new york times versus sullivan, they had to prove actual malice. so they are not taking that case next term. we are awaiting some big decisions on religious liberties, immigration, the power of the epa when it comes to climate change. checking on all that now and we ll come back with you guys in a few minutes. okay, jessica schneider, thank you very much. joining us is caroline kitchener, national reporter focused on the politics of abortion for the washington post. good to h
Intelligence he suggestions. Thats the big argument. This has been such a contentious issue we saw the whole drama play out with the House Intelligence Committee and their Top Republican leader devin nunes came, saw the material. Out of the protocol of that committee and them adam schiff, came and looked at the same material. Theres answers about this coming from the white house first from the Deputy Press Secretary who says there was no attempt to keep adam schiff responsible. Not that im aware of at all. I think the bigger point is theres something there. Wed love to come see it which is exactly what we said. It turns out if theres something of substance for him to know about, we want him to
see it. Frarjly i think if there wasnt something of sub stns, he would have walked out that moment from the white house and come out and declared that this was a big waste of time and a big dog and pony show. He didnt do that. He doesnt do that. Its very telling in what he probably saw on friday.
will have some real issues with that because they ve been very clear in drawing those lines about regulatory excess and not. paul: yeah, dan, this does seem questions the tipped to the supreme court. this particular, there s another lower court ruling in washington state, the judge the rule that the fda s restrictions were too severe. so you ve got both sides of this competing views on this, so it s almost a perfect case for the supreme court to consider and settle. do you think it ll do that? i think it may step in and, you know, for reasons that democrats and the left may not ultimately appreciate, because i think the justices especially on the conservative side, gore such, alito, kavanaugh they look for opportunities to make rulings making precise parameters on with where counts can intervene and where the courts can intervene and where the regulatory the powers are exceeded here. and i think probably on those kind of technical but
are penalizing us for being religious. you are penalizing us for our free exercise. so in both cases, free exercise won over establishment, and that s happening in case after case. big free exercise, small establishment, it s clear from this court. joan, let me read you part of justice gore such s opinion. the madness review that it had a duty to suppress observances even as it allows secular speech. the broader question beyond coach kennedy is, what does this mean for opening the door to more prayer in schools? is this a complete reversal of the 92 decision of lee versus weissman? is it all different? it certainly calls into question everything back to 1962 when the court first said that schools could not require prayer, you know, in schools. this is part of such a larger