Until there are other developments. Commissioner hyland. Id like to congratulate you as well on the excellence of the report. It was very clear. Interesting. Hallelujah. Mary francis did a great job. I did have a couple thoughts. One was on priorities, any communityinitiated landmark designation should, in my opinion, go to the top because it can really leverage the resources of those volunteers who really think its important and you want to capture their momentum while they have it. So the community ones that youve identified, the Rube Goldberg building. We did talk before about resources and we have requested and additional fulltime head count in the budget that was denied and i question for you, help me remember, we have one current fulltime head count to be distributed amongst multiple staffs currently in the budget for this program . Yes. Thats sort of the short easy answer. The good news is because, again, we have a backlog that were dealing with we are hiring another preservatio
Selfexplanatory. Certainly happy to address any specific questions you may have about any of these designations that are currently on file. And then the last portion of the report youll recognize from the summer, this is the memo we put together for the three Community Initiated designations that we most recently discussed, the goldberg building, the Old University mound old ladies home and the lang house. As you know, were actively working with the consultant on the goldberg building, but the other two we have not received any direction on to date. So, with that, that concludes my comments. Again, happy to discuss this in any way you think is most effective. Thats it. Thank you very much. And mr. Fry i will say thank you for including that whole process and that graphic really is very, very helpful. I agree. What a great change. Thank you. Commissioner matsuda. Yes, i totally agree. I like this temperature bar, color bar, to let us know very clearly where youre at. I also like just a
Designation reports online. There could be a separate section for reports that, you know, were pursued or completed but they werent formally designated because at least were disseminating that information to the public for their own use. Thats one way of dealing with it. Well, im wondering how the commission feels about this particular project. I mean, do we just say, oh, okay, its done, it will just live forever in a data base . Or do we feel like its worth having this building thats already been Research Done and got all the way i mean, do we go back to supervisor cohen and say, and maybe wait until the legislation passes, but we go back to supervisor cohen and say, look, we still think this is a very important and valid landmark building, could you now go ahead and nominate it . Were happy to initiate that conversation with the supervisor or along with the commission if one of you would like to attend, maybe president hasz or Vice President wolfram, were certainly happy to have that
Any additional work because six months seems like a very long time. Half a year seems like a long time for us not to have any idea. It was just a suggestion. But you are correct, we have standardized a lot of this so we can just run a report and we may have to tweak a few things just to provide some clarification, but if the commission would like to see this quarterly were certainly amenable to that. Again, we just thought because its so much data to absorb at one time maybe six months made more sense than 3 or 4 months. I think we all absorbed it really quickly. Thats good. When you have a data format its not that hard to print a report. Thats true. Okay. I, for one, would like to see it quarterly as weve had it before. Thats great. Commissioner johnck. I congratulate you, its a great report and echo the previous comments. As i was looking this over, what i was interested in as a fairly new commissioner is thinking about what are the gaps, whats missing . And so i was interested to re
Selfexplanatory. Certainly happy to address any specific questions you may have about any of these designations that are currently on file. And then the last portion of the report youll recognize from the summer, this is the memo we put together for the three Community Initiated designations that we most recently discussed, the goldberg building, the Old University mound old ladies home and the lang house. As you know, were actively working with the consultant on the goldberg building, but the other two we have not received any direction on to date. So, with that, that concludes my comments. Again, happy to discuss this in any way you think is most effective. Thats it. Thank you very much. And mr. Fry i will say thank you for including that whole process and that graphic really is very, very helpful. I agree. What a great change. Thank you. Commissioner matsuda. Yes, i totally agree. I like this temperature bar, color bar, to let us know very clearly where youre at. I also like just a