Welcome to the American Enterprise institute. I am a visiting fellow here as well as the senior Political Columnist at the examiner. What id do here is two programs i am involved with, one is the culture of competition where we talk about competition, we talk about things like subsidies and crony capitalism and when competition yields good fruit and when the pursuit of profit might not yield good fruit. The other thing i work on is called the program on human flourishing, where we talk about happiness. Both of those topics are addressed in our book we will be discussing today which is the up side of down why failing well is the key to success. Here to talk about this we have the author, megan mcardle. Megan mcardle is an Economics Writer at bloomberg. She has written that the atlantic, the economist, newsweek, in addition to writing this, her first book. Our respondent is tyler callan from george using thegeorge washington university. You might know him from his blood marginal revoluti
I was what was needed, developed legislation and past the Mental Health systems act of 1980. It passed through congress one month before jimmy was involuntarily retired from the the incomingnd president never implemented. It was one of the greatest disappointment supply life. First Lady Rosalynn carter. While David Cameron was on a threeday trade visit to china, deputy Prime Minister nick clegg fielded questions from members of the house of commons. Questions were on british immigration policy and Rising Energy prices. As the session began, the deputy Prime Minister offered condolences to those who died in a Helicopter Crash in glasgow. This is about 35 minutes. Order, questions for the Prime Minister, julie elliott. I have been asked to reply i have been asked to reply as i was saying, i have been asked to reply on behalf of my rifle friend, the Prime Minister, who has been visiting china. I am sure the whole house wishes to join me in offering condolences to the family and friends of
It is 6 feet above the grade of mr. Peters property and supported by the region that runs along the Northern Property line of mr. Peters property. Mr. Peters filed this appeal because he knew that the building and the department and the supplying department and all of the permit holders have addressed mr. Peters questions regarding the impact of the project on his retaining Foundation Wall. It outlines the project and does not address the reviews of mr. Peters retaining wall and foundation. And in fact, the plan was engineered without reviewing this retaining wall which is visible only from mr. Peters garage. And i have a picture of the wall. That is the wall and that goes on top. That way . Okay. Mr. Peters wants the permit application to reflect the impact that does not retaining wall is going to sustain from the amount and the effect of the additional load that is going to be created by this addition to property and if any. And but the depth of the excavation and the method whether
Emily aaron quinn, permit to alter a building new onestory addition at front of building with new terrace at 2nd floor; renovation of 1st floor bathroom; renovation of exterior landscaping, stairs and entry; no changes to north and west elevations . Application no. 2012 02 23 4735. For hearing today good morning my name is inaudible and i represent peters who live in the property adjacent and i want to express the support of the project because it will be a terrific improvement to the property and this neighborhood. It is 6 feet above the grade of mr. Peters property and supported by the region that runs along the Northern Property line of mr. Peters property. Mr. Peters filed this appeal because he knew that the building and the department and the supplying department and all of the permit holders have addressed mr. Peters questions regarding the impact of the project on his retaining Foundation Wall. It outlines the project and does not address the reviews of mr. Peters retaining wal
Reviewed and issued. And according to our code. And properly. And i believe that the code requires that new structure cannot surcharge against an adjacent neighbors structure, isnt that correct . The Foundation Analysis in many cases there is shared foundations throughout the city and each property has an adjoining property providing the lateral support. And the Foundation Plan and the calculation and design will need to comply with the code and those issues with the property rights. And so, there is a consideration of whether the foundation is but the analysis would be to support their own building. Within their own property. And not be able to surcharge against it. No surcharges could occur. And they do. Generally speaking there is a 45 degree bearing area for the foundation that is going to spread out and so you will get the support from the adjacent building and property. Thank you. Is there any Public Comment on this item . Seeing none, i will start our rebuttal. You have three ad