Attachment 4 to your memo typical for all schematic designs so the Development Team will work with staff at a staff level to work through those they they are generally considered to be consistent with the schematic designs so we anticipate going to the board of supervisors on february on february 3rd and that and that will be the last Regulatory Approval in front of the commission or the board the rest is delegated to the executive director and at the staff level. Previously with another project that came before you there was a delegation for the for for the for the precise location and nondiscriminatory evenly all baseline. Ive heard the commission applaud such efforts in previous projects. Yes . Will we get a report back . Yes, certainly. We can provide that information in an informational memorandum to the commission theres theres a 60day clock that the developer has to submit the precise locations. Are we also going to get a report back on the marketing and selection and all of tha
I think the exact location of the bmr units we have conditions of approval i think attachment 4 to your memo typical for all schematic designs so the Development Team will work with staff at a staff level to work through those they they are generally considered to be consistent with the schematic designs so we anticipate going to the board of supervisors on february on february 3rd and that and that will be the last Regulatory Approval in front of the commission or the board the rest is delegated to the executive director and at the staff level. Previously with another project that came before you there was a delegation for the for for the for the precise location and nondiscriminatory evenly all baseline. Ive heard the commission applaud such efforts in previous projects. Yes . Will we get a report back . Yes, certainly. We can provide that information in an informational memorandum to the commission theres theres a 60day clock that the developer has to submit the precise locations. A
Understand. Its an accumulation of. Correct. So somebody would commit a petty theft and they had certain prior theft convictions, those theft convictions would then kick up that petty theft to a felony theft, which would be a bookable offense. Right. Now, without that option, everything under 950 would be a petty theft, that takes the option for booking solely on that theft, booking meaning taking them to the station and making that arrest and then transferring them down to county jail, that takes that option off the table. Basically we go back to the misdemeanor citation requirement where we would have to cite the person out at the scene, release them with a citation on the arrest, complete our investigation, but we wouldnt be removing the person on a custodial arrest and taking them to the station and taking them to county jail. Whats a custodial arrest . We are taking custody of the person. We do an investigate, we determine this theft is a prop 47 misdemeanor theft, at the completi
Complete our investigation, but we wouldnt be removing the person on a custodial arrest and taking them to the station and taking them to county jail. Whats a custodial arrest . We are taking custody of the person. We do an investigate, we determine this theft is a prop 47 misdemeanor theft, at the completion of that investigation and we have good identification of the person, we know who they are, they dont have any warrants for their arrest or no other reason why we would be taking them to a Police Facility we would issue them a citation with a court date and we would send them on their way out in the field. The custodial arrest would be when the officers go through the same investigation process and would have a reason to take that person physically into custody, transport them back to a Police Station and then subsequently down to county jail for processing. Okay i think if i heard correctly in your Previous Report on this property crime threshold that it was at 450, but you, the d
Question whats that. Codify. Notoriety when you codify. To your previous question were not changing the legal rights of restriction either the community or developer those are essentially staying the same were restraining order trying to approach that on the front end if people are more cognizant of whether or not this is appropriate for the neighborhood frankly so be it thats the objective to make sure were having this communication so the venues and people are with your of it and that is hard to agree with commissioner melgar. So you have questions. Well done. Commissioners i was going to as interject this thing about putting more restrictions on the developers to you know deal with the sound like proofing in the past a lot of the venues were impacted because the onerous was put on them i dont know the exact history of the independents but going back to night clubs like slimdz they took over a warehouse that was brick there was a lot of clubs in those Industrial Areas and the onerous