used to run a planned parenthood clinic in san francisco when he was a longtime keyboard member they made a decision while he was on the board of directors to host and embed a planned parenthood clinic and set up their own office headquarters based in san francisco. that s information that he never disclosed to the senate judiciary committee and he never disclosed to the defendants in these lawsuits from planned parenthood. tucker: how do you know what s true? we know it s true because of the 990 forms that were filed by the family resource center that judge orrick was was a longtime keyboard member of. he had only said to the senate judiciary committee that he was a member of the board of directors of that organization that to this day is hosting a planned parenthood clinic embedded in its office space. judge orrick only told them he was on the board of directors until 1999, it turns out he was actually persisting on the board
their collusion, based upon the evidence, there was no collusion. the fact that russia included the mic intruded into our election process should be troubling to everyone. nobody saying it didn t happen. tucker: i m sick it didn t happen. they re not 22 intelligence agencies in this country there are 17 and that includes the coast guard. not one person who was ever made that allegation to me has explained how they affected the outcome at all. they didn t have the election, they did alter the election, the whole thing is a hoax. we know that it was hacked. director, yesterday said there was no doubt whatsoever it said from the senate. we don t know what the effect is we don t willing to give it out. we don t know whether people voted for donald trump or hillary clinton because of the hacking. what we do is know was that there was hacking, it involved exposing internal workings of the democratic party. we do know that. that s up for debate. spill not not only is it up for debate. e
networks that treat me so badly is fake news? should i do that? let me get back to james comey s testimony you said he didn t tell the truth, did he ask for a pledge of loyalty from you, it s another thing he said. president trump: no he did not. he said those things under oath, would you be willing to speak under oath to give your version. president trump: 100%. if robert mueller wanted to speak with you on that? president trump: i would be glad to say what i just told yo you. tucker: and coulter joins us tonight, what did you think? i m glad donald trump threatened james comey with those conversations being taped, what he had to say changed quite dramatically once he had to worry that they might have been taped. everyone forgets this but when trump sent out that tweet saying he better hope that room wasn t taped, when he tweeted that, the biggest story that comey was leaking was that trump had tried to obstruct justice by
did it happen, what the effect is, i m willing to give you interactive bipartisanship, and willing to give you we don t know the effect but we know what happened. tucker: we don t know the details. is not a meaningful claim unless we can explain what the clay means. it happened we don t know the effect. tucker: you can repeat it as much as you want, but it s meaningless unless it s companied by details and is not. the attorney general of the united states is loathed by the left, i think that s legitimate. they are now trying to take them out of commission to the extent that he artie has been on the ground that he is somehow collaborating with the russians. to his internal disk credit and shame suggested on a cowardly way yesterday with attic splitting what he meant. i m asking overly simple question. this guy come at the attorney general brushed elbows with the russian ambassador, does that make him a collaborator with the russian government? what we know is that at least two t
2016. may have, suggested, he doesn t really know. neither does anybody else. even if it s true, who cares? what does it mean a question mark doesn t matter. house minority leader nancy pelosi never want to wait for faxes already demanding that sessions resign over it. i did say on march 2nd that he should resign as attorney general. tucker: yet he should resign, but with the crime here exactly? is there evidence jeff sessions worked with russia to elect president trump? never has been any evidence of that. here s what he is accused of doing. last september, he had met with russians in the office, it was one of the 25 times he met with an advance at her in the course of his official duties. then he spoke at an event in global partners in democracy. dozens of investors attend at that event which was organized by the obama administration,