write a memo on that occasion. this a lot of things that don t cooperate with each other. loretta lynch is at the core of all of these because it undermines almost everything he said. when he said he was shocked that trump hinted that he would like to see flynn and treated well, she gave him a direct order and unlike trump or she apparently resisted, he did not resist that pressure. he was very upset about trump s suggestions but it had no effect on the investigation which we know continued and then he didn t object to trump the way he didn t object to loretta lynch is pressure either. he didn t go to jeff sessions or any subordinates. it was just not convincing. you brought up the new york times piece that february article was a signature moment that developed, it was based on anonymous sources. he was using euphemisms when he
james comey confirmed a lot of what i said. tucker: you might be able to find some overstatement in there but here s what s true. as of 8:00 p.m. eastern time tonight, donald trump is still the president of the united states. that means on the most basic level, his testimony failed to achieve its goal. removing trump from office was the goal. there was collusion, russia hacked our election, salts are democracy, imperils our way of life. you hear those lines all the time, but nobody in d.c. actually believes that. that s why nobody ever explains how exactly it happened or what specifically the effects work because they have no idea and they don t really care. they just want trump gone along with anyone else who was in the way, russia is just a means. first they tried racism, rubber that? he was supposed to be the biggest races, hillary clinton based an entire presidential campaign on that, it didn t work. in the end, trump at a higher
said he doubted the veracity based on the sources. all of that is a euphemism for unmasking and reverse targeting surveillance. it s the subject of a subpoena by the house intelligence committee. it may be the subpoenas have any veracity that samantha power or susan rice or john brennan were using surveillance of foreign operatives to find information about political appointments, unmasking those names and licking them the to the press. no wonder the new york times says it can find the original sources because they are either under cepeda or their subordinates shortly will be. no wonder comey doesn t want to get anywhere near that story because there may have been people in the fbi who were doing the same thing with those people. tucker: i would never claim that the trump administration or the presidents himself are blameless, i don t think they are. i think they made a lot of mistakes and it s frustrating to watch. it does seem to me that he s democratically elected, he is
until 2003 come along after they had invited planned parenthood into their space, host of them at, and embedded them on their premises and continue to do so for many years. tucker: that seems like an obvious conflict of interest. is there anyway that you could use that fact and i m assuming it is a fact to get him off this case? that s exactly why the center of medical progress have fired a motion to disqualify him from this case. a clear case from this long-standing personal and professional relationship with planned parenthood who is both a name to in a lawsuit and has membership in the national abortion federation which has been suing me for over two years at this point. judge orrick has long-standing personal and professional ties to planned parenthood and the abortion industry, a
together, we are perfectly balanced, our senses awake, our hearts racing as one. i know this is sudden, but they say: if you love something. set it free. see you around, giulia