which are cited as potential causes in these incidents by republicans. so i think the lack of will to even advance those proposals and attach a republican brand to it is another reason why you re seeing in the inaction on those fronts. and then the durability, i have to mention it, the durability of the filibuster and democratic support of upholding that filibuster is another reason why you need 60 votes, not 50 plus 1. howard: all right. good conversation on a difficult topic. guy benson, laura fink, thanks very much. up next, how about all those media stories about the georgia election law preventing people from voting that turns out to be wrong? and later what kellyanne conway told president trump right after the election. drive off the lot. or more. that s why farmers new car replacement pays to replace it with a new one of the same make and model. get a whole lot of something with farmers policy perks. we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum
kemp has just really done great in every single category. regarding the future of the republican party, i think that was the second part of your question well, the kingmaker status, do you think his kingmaker status, donald trump s, hinges on this? well, i mean, look, i think he s still extremely influential with republican voters. it s just in this particular case he ran up against somebody who figured out how to solve the equation. it doesn t mean donald trump isn t an influential person anymore. kemp has had the benefit, too and sometimes in the republican party the way you can explain success is by having all the right enemies. desantis has this right now. kemp has had all the right enemies. he defeated stacey abrams, stood up against some of the corporations in georgia in 2020, he stuck to his guns on the georgia election law that a lot of the national liberal establishment came down on him for. so even though donald trump was mad at him, he then cultivated some of the rig
republicans anyway. why are they watching their back? why are afraid of it? number two, allowing democrats to mislabel bills. remember jim crow 2.0 the georgia election law. that was totally not true. the president of the united states mislabeling it stacey abrams was responsible for atlanta losing $100 million. she changed her editorial in u.s.a. today because she realized she was responsible for this. she has kept her head down ever since. and i think this could be the reason that the wind gets on the back when politician left or right knows they are right, they are not going to melt at the thought of losing corporate support. and those kids at disney, the youngsters at disney that don t agree with the walkout and the protest and the tears, maybe they will have the courage to stand up. so the ceo doesn t interest to bend to the left. i think that s exactly right, brian. i would say aspect here is just like sports you are talking about the atlanta braves losing the all-star game,
Premise of the question, yes, google was Hiding Information from its users, he effectively conceded. It was for their own good. According to feinberg, google didnt want to lead people down pathways that we would not find to be authoritative information. Authoritative information. Youve heard that phrase a lot in the last year. Authoritative information is the opposite of misinformation, or disinformation, or worse, a conspiracy theory. Its really important. All you are allowed to see is authoritative information. Its worth knowing and this and many other cases, what is it . In this case, where did google get the authoritative information . In this case, they got that information from a group led by a noted man of science, the name sounds familiar, he almost singlehandedly stopped all public speculation about the lab leak early in the pandemic. They did this in one swoop by organizing a letter to the land, standing as a known fact, there was no possibility of this virus, the coronavirus
Premise of the question, yes, google was Hiding Information from its users, he effectively conceded. It was for their own good. According to feinberg, google didnt want to lead people down pathways that we would not find to be authoritative information. Authoritative information. Youve heard that phrase a lot in the last year. Authoritative information is the opposite of misinformation, or disinformation, or worse, a conspiracy theory. Its really important. All you are allowed to see is authoritative information. Its worth knowing and this and many other cases, what is it . In this case, where did google get the authoritative information . In this case, they got that information from a group led by a noted man of science, the name sounds familiar, he almost singlehandedly stopped all public speculation about the lab leak early in the pandemic. They did this in one swoop by organizing a letter to the land, standing as a known fact, there was no possibility of this virus, the coronavirus