distribution to allow for units that would accommodate people with children that needed more bedrooms and if that can be worked out as part of the plan. i think if it is done in the right way, it can be done without new approval but to redistribute york unit makes more to try to accommodate your unit to try to accommodate that. there was a question about parking also. the neighbors make a good case about it being somewhat underparked. that is the best we will do. especially on potrero hill. there is a lot of parking at mission bay that i am aware of and hopefully, there will be other structures that will be built to allow some of the employees to park and not have to look for street parking in the vicinity. another thing that was brought up was the transit on 16th street. that is critical. that is a major corridor between caltrain and light rail and bart on 16th and mission. that is unnatural for other robust transit that brings people right along there. they have every rea
here. i do not know that there are a three-bedroom units. it would be nice if we did have distribution to allow for units that would accommodate people with children that needed more bedrooms and if that can be worked out as part of the plan. i think if it is done in the right way, it can be done without new approval but to redistribute york unit makes more to try to accommodate your unit to try to accommodate that. there was a question about parking also. the neighbors make a good case about it being somewhat underparked. that is the best we will do. especially on potrero hill. there is a lot of parking at mission bay that i am aware of and hopefully, there will be other structures that will be built to allow some of the employees to park and not have to look for street parking in the vicinity. another thing that was brought up was the transit on 16th street. that is critical. that is a major corridor between caltrain and light rail and bart on 16th and mission. that is un
side to respond to. the weaving in and out of tracking the corner was [unintelligible] having 100 feet of a garage. i think for me that is a responsible and good idea. this is rarely a bikeway. 100 feet of a garage with people honking on seventh on the bike, there will not see it. it is like a green screen. that is how you perceive the nahyan active use. the building does some amazing things. i am looking at responsible models and i will pause for identification, this is one of them. the height is not an exception. the heights was premeditated in how we looked out what was necessary to rezone the eastern neighborhood. with with a responsible attitude toward protecting pdr. this is as close as we could get. i appreciate the summary on the institutional proximity. the other institutions which are close by khomeni active users with large numbers of employees, we are moving in the right direction. i like the architectural response. this fresh and thought- provoking. i like th
mass of layers down and then our proposals are on the middle right, lower, there is an actual parity between the sponsor s keep and our scheme where in their proposal, it actually steps up where as the contours of the block step downward. and so we re encouraging you to take a very close look at our proposal and we feel like it s an appropriate limitation to the massing of the project and we ought to be able to work within those massing limits. thank you. president olague: thank you. i m going to read a few cards here of people who are in support of the d.r. requester. jane segal, uta rikart, joe quigley, tony kim. excuse me, there are two d.r. requesters, i think we both get president olague: of course. the second d.r. requester gets five minutes. that s my fault. sorry about that. could you put the slide back up on the screen? just go ahead and start talking. thank you for your time today. i m here to represent myself, my husband, and our three young children. we