was a split decision, to have in one decision with the lord chief justice, lord burnett, not agree with the majority of the court, which was sir geoffrey voss and lord justice underhill, that the majority accepted that it was clearly an unsafe country dissent refugees because there is a real risk that they would not have their asylum claims determined in rwanda and be sent back to their countries of origin, in some instances what is called chaining through a third country, and suffer persecution. this an important thing in relation to the facts, but, yes, they were looking at the facts at the time in the spring of 2022 when the rwanda policy was starting to commence, and importantly they did except that rwanda s government was acting in good faith but on the fact and the evidence before the court and looking at litigation, they found that rwanda is not a safe country
The UK High Court has ruled in favour of Air India, quashing an appeal against the India's air carrier stating that a delay to a flight operated on one leg of a trip cannot be isolated from the rest of the trip.
In a significant development for the law relating to the aviation industry a bench of the English Court of Appeal, headed by the Master of the Rolls Sir Geoffrey Voss, has found in favour of Air India Ltd in a contested dispute with a passenger .