this is a test for robert mueller. right? it is. let s be clear. the message you ll hear from the president and many of his loyalists is this is not connected at all to trump or to russia, but let s go through the facts here. you did a good job of listing the number of criminal charges he s facing in two courts. this is just the first of two trials here. this was the president s campaign chairman. the president chose him specifically to help him secure the republican nomination. so he was not an insignificant player in the trump campaign.
collusion is not a crime. the president and rudy giuliani are now saying this. this after the president has repeated some version of no collusion a whopping 165 times since may of 2016. we have the author of the truth about trump . and harry litman. i m happy to have you both on. harry, the president and his lawyer have gone from no collusion to collusion. collusion isn t a crime. collusion as we know is not a legal term. what charges do trump and his family need to be concerned about? in a word, conspiracy. but it doesn t help their credibility that he s been screaming no collusion, no collusion from the rooftops and then there s kind of a never mind moment oh, maybe it is collusion but that s not a crime. but it s always been the case. people have been saying it on these shows and others for
into the situation and speak to the nra about it. and then he came back with a position that mirrors the nras. do you think he caved to them? first the nra should do something. the nra doesn t control guns. they do but they re not supposed to. it s the president who should have a bigger voice. but go on. he s got the state department, the defense department to consultant with. it is ironic he consultants with the nra on this. and the nra is funded by the gun manufacturers. they have nothing to gain from these cads, these computer assisted designs being down loadable on the internet. but i really do hope he backs off. there was no reason for the government to flip on this. the case brought by mr. wilson who describes himself as a crypto anarchist. had been all the way up to the supreme court and had lost.
lawsuit. it s currently illegal to produce or own a fully plastic gun under the undetectable firearms act, but this law is probably not specific enough bu because they probably never foresaw people could be able to use a printer. trump said he was going to look into the situation and speak to the nra about it. and then he came back with a position that mirrors the nras. do you think he caved to them? first the nra should do something. the nra doesn t control guns. they do but they re not supposed to. it s the president who should have a bigger voice. but go on. he s got the state department, the defense department to consultant with. it is ironic he consultants with the nra on this. and the nra is funded by the gun manufacturers. they have nothing to gain from