There also is this big news out of nebraska. Regulators have approved the construction of the keystone xl pipeline through that state. We want to get your reaction to it. If you support the keystone xl pipeline, called 202 7488000. If you oppose it, call 202 7488001. You can weigh in on social media at cspan to vijay for our twitter handle and you can post a comment on facebook. Com cspan. Heres the headline one more time. It is from the omaha world herald. It is approved, but hurdles likely remain. That is out of omaha. Joining us by phone right now is ellen gilmer, illegal reporter there. A legal reporter there. Guest thanks for having me. Host explain what regulators and nebraska decided and what it all means. Guest regulators decided that keystone xl can build its pipeline across the state. Trans canada, the company that backed the pipeline, did not get what it wanted. Trans canada had a certain route it wanted to build on and state regulators said you can build, but you need to bu
Policy in general. Economics and the global trade watch director. Good morning to both of you. I want to start with this headline out of bloomberg. Nafta talks are getting bogged down. I want to get you to respond to this. What are the hardline demands . Guest this is the irony. And the are deadlocked administration decides to withdraw, its not want to be because of unions were groups like mine that have thought no nafta is better than more of this nafta. There is a big corporate lobby trying to persuade them to not respond to u. S. Proposals. It goes to restructuring nafta to remove the incentives for outsourcing jobs. They want to get rid of special protections for investors to make it less risky and cheaper to offshore jobs to mexico. They went to get rid of the ban on by american. They want to raise the level of contact in a product. They want to avoid products from china sneaking inside. They want to do a review every five years to make sure the agreement is working. Thats what we
Guest this is the irony. And the are deadlocked administration decides to withdraw, its not want to be because of unions were groups like mine that have thought no nafta is better than more of this nafta. There is a big corporate lobby trying to persuade them to not respond to u. S. Proposals. It goes to restructuring nafta to remove the incentives for outsourcing jobs. They want to get rid of special protections for investors to make it less risky and cheaper to offshore jobs to mexico. They went to get rid of the ban on by american. They want to raise the level of contact in a product. They want to avoid products from china sneaking inside. They want to do a review every five years to make sure the agreement is working. Thats what we do with domestic legislation. And is what democrats republicans and unions and conservative groups have been asking for. We get the benefits of trade without all of the outsourcing incentives. Host what do you see in the current talks and what you see fr
Partners. The irony is where brazil and india governments are, the bottom line is reforms need to happen internally that are about legal questions, but theres also a strategic level of interest that needs to go on here. [inaudible] do you think there is a possibility of a parallel within the United States . Great question. In the book, there is a chapter on the chinese approach. One of the key aspects besides the Massive Campaign of intellectual property theft, you have how this links into an assassins doctrine where youre looking at a potential enemy and saying, im going to turn their strengths into a weakness. The ability to mobilize massive Human Capital behind it. This is used to describe the internal selfcensoring model, the human flesh Search Engine is how it translates. When you talk about the number of folks involved, a mix of cyber militia and patriotic hacker communities, the scale is enormous. It is measuring and hundreds of thousands of folks. Most of those are people who a
Five prisoners from Guantanamo Bay released. We want to get your take. Should the u. S. Negotiate with the taliban for the only prisoner of war . Republicans, 202 5853881. Democrats, 202 5853880. Independents, 202 5853882. You can send us a tweet, cspanwj or post your comments on facebook. Com cspan. You can email us at journal cspan. Org. Have a fourth line for active and retired military, 202 5853883. No negotiating with terrorists versus leave no soldier behind. With the war in afghanistan boding down, the plight of bergdahl has left the u. S. Government trying to reconcile those two longstanding policies. The official declined to be identified. The Defense Department is also involved. Declined comment, but Bowe Bergdahls family welcome d the statement. We welcome this development and we applaud the unity and purpose and resolve of the white house and other u. S. Government agencies involved. We hope everyone takes this opportunity seriously. We are cautiously optimistic these discu