state of texas. there s one part of the law raising a lot of eyebrows. how do you interpret the part of this law that enables private citizens to enforce the abortion ban? is that constitutional? i don t think it is. i think the entire law is unconstitutional and if we had a regular supreme court, it would have been overturned on the infamous shadow document. that s not what happened. they designed a law that they could sort soft look the other way. everybody could look the other way and pretend they weren t overturning roe v. wade and they could get away with it. merritt garland has done something important here in filing this lawsuit, the united states v. texas. not in a sneaky way, like they came, to try to play gamesman