state of texas. >> there's one part of the law raising a lot of eyebrows. how do you interpret the part of this law that enables private citizens to enforce the abortion ban? is that constitutional? >> i don't think it is. i think the entire law is unconstitutional and if we had a regular supreme court, it would have been overturned on the infamous shadow document. that's not what happened. they designed a law that they could sort soft look the other way. everybody could look the other way and pretend they weren't overturning roe v. wade and they could get away with it. merritt garland has done something important here in filing this lawsuit, the united states v. texas. not in a sneaky way, like they came, to try to play gamesman