immigrants already here living in the u.s. in his own words, they have to go. trump is positioning himself the head of what we ll call the round-them-up caucus, the part of the party that s perfectly comfortable telling millions of americans we re coming for your friends and loved ones and colleagues and coworkers. we re going to lock them up and throw them out of the country. then there s the nominally more moderate ring of the party which is arguing not that trump s approach is wrong, but that it s just impracticable. unrealistic. or as jeb bush told the washington post, quote, a plan needs to be grounded in reality. obviously, there s some ideas that have merit, but the majority of it is really not a workable plan that could ever pass congress. donald trump s eight-page plan is gibberish and unworkable. what he s not doing is embracing a workable system. while that may be correct on the merits, it might not be as extreme as trump s rhetoric as they pointed out on this show l
jeremy peters, in the politico piece, a senior republican is quoted as saying issa has made this personal and added an unnecessary element to the news cycle. a lot of republicans believe questions about ben ghazi and frustrated that congressman issa has taken away from the facts and made it too personal. well, that s exactly right. i think this is the darrell issa we have seen for years now. he somehow managed to repress his anger for a while back during the irs hearings. remember how polite he was to loy business lerner. he let her go after she pleaded the fifth amendment and enraged some of the more conservative members on his panel. now you see him is at full mint here. i don t know how many americans expected that, you know, a an investigation led by a political party was going to be impartial any way. but he has got a real problem on his hands and i think the bigger
that this man ran as the anti-bush has now rendered completely ridiculous. and to that point, no matter what you think of whether or not this is a good idea and protects our national security, steve kornacki, as a candidate, the president was against this, was he not? i think what this really is a story, this is a story about the bipartisan security state, because it was during the bush years that we had fisa became a big controversy in 2006 when it came out that after 9/11 in the wake of the enactment of the patriot act the bush administration doing the bulk of the phone records. the bush administration has listening in without a warrant and listening in on phone calls that involved the domestic party and international party so the big controversy last decade was you really should go through the fisa court to do that and that got resolved. what we didn t know until now, from that point forward, very possibly the bulk collection of phone records was continuing very possibly through
sncc, you are op. nt front lines of the struggle to win african americans the right to vote. what are the parallels between what happened back in the 60s and now 50 years later what we re seeing today? the parallels are that in 1960s a political party, largely southern democrats were allied against the right of black people to vote, they connived and done all sorts of things to keep black people from voting. lyndon johnson pushed through the voting rights law, the 1965 law cleared away all the barriers and the democrats who had been hostile to black voting migrated to the republican party and from the early 1960s until today the republicans have been more often than not on the part of restricting voting rights for african americans and other americans to reduce the size of the electorate so their candidates will win. at their core, sir, are these laws racist or more complicated,
activists venting their anger at washington. he has closed the gap and might win the primary. would you be the first tea party senator? i m running as a republican. reporter: a political party. it s not a political party. reporter: crist by contrast is no tea party activist. have you sat down with a tea party and talked to them? no. reporter: not once? no, i d be happy to. reporter: for the tea party express there s anner. the republicans embracing massive tax-and-spend policies, that s what the gop is about, and that s what charlie crist did. reporter: republicans and even former democrats are ready to take down some of the biggest names in politics from democratic majority senator harry reid to republican john mccain. but democrats say all that infighting between crist and rubio actually presents an