know the post office doesn t have much money, presumably treasury will have to pony up but what about fujitsu? have to pony up but what about fu itsu? , , . have to pony up but what about fu itsu? , , ~ , have to pony up but what about fu itsu? , , . , , fujitsu? this is what the inquiry is there to do fujitsu? this is what the inquiry is there to do because fujitsu? this is what the inquiry is there to do because what - fujitsu? this is what the inquiry is there to do because what we ll i fujitsu? this is what the inquiry is there to do because what we ll do | fujitsu? this is what the inquiry is l there to do because what we ll do is get the answers from sir wyn williams, the retired judge, and when we get that we will get the accountability, including fujitsu, frankly, because there s no way to the taxpayer should be on the book for all of this compensation. if others can clearly be proved to have notjust been wrong that double down on it in that process. band notjust been wrong
level of detail, who would your mone be on? ., ., ., money be on? i would go with elon musk. money be on? i would go with elon musk- here s money be on? i would go with elon musk. here s why, money be on? i would go with elon musk. here s why, elon money be on? i would go with elon musk. here s why, elon musk- money be on? i would go with elon musk. here s why, elon musk bet l musk. here s why, elon musk bet on himself musk. here s why, elon musk bet on himself and musk. here s why, elon musk bet on himself and he bets to win. same ruestion, himself and he bets to win. same question, paul? himself and he bets to win. same question, paul? definitely- himself and he bets to win. same question, paul? definitely mark. question, paul? definitely mark zuckerberg. question, paul? definitely mark zuckerberg, he question, paul? definitely mark zuckerberg, he has question, paul? definitely mark zuckerberg, he has more - question, paul? definitely markl zuckerberg, he has more mar
things like management and software develop overseas, operations were kept separate so the local way of doing business continued. fu itsu is one of business continued. fu itsu is °ne°fjapan 5 business continued. fu itsu is one of japan s biggest h one of japan s biggest employers one ofjapan s biggest employers in it and among its most respected brands overseas. the dna of fujitsu s success can be traced back to the 70s when the japanese government was trying to counter the dominance of america s ibm. their strategy was to eliminate competition at home between japanese companies like fujitsu, hitachi, toshiba, mitsubishi and instead organise them into three giant alliances with the might of the government behind them to pet all of japanese attack against ibm. but despite its size, some argue the company s no longer innovative. argue the company s no longer innovative- innovative. the unique advantage innovative. the unique advantage is innovative. the unique - advantage is a re
years ago. in the uk fu itsu is one of years ago. in the uk fu itsu is of the i years ago. in the uk fujitsu is one of the government s - years ago. in the uk fujitsu is one of the government s top i one of the government s top five it contractors. the government five it contractors. the government is - five it contractors. the government is tending | five it contractors. the i government is tending to five it contractors. tue: government is tending to go five it contractors. tta: government is tending to go for large, small number of very large, small number of very large contracts that favoured very large suppliers, often international firms like fujitsu. international firms like fu itsu. , . ., , fujitsu. fu itsu officials in to 0 fujitsu. fujitsu officials in tokyo declined fujitsu. fujitsu officials in tokyo declined our- fujitsu. fujitsu officials in i tokyo declined our interview requests, saying that it s a matter for its uk subsidiary. fujitsu uk has said: as the company c