as a global power in the 21st century. you have helped to reinvigorate the quad, your leadership of the 620 is making new strides on climate finance, and you ve been a proponent of international institutions and global solutions to global challenges. prime minister narendra modi expressed happiness over the strengthening of ties between india and the us in recent years. translation: friends. during my visit in 2014, my dear friend, president biden, was also here with me at the state department. at that time, he had referred to india america partnership as a partnership over the horizon. in this period of nine years since then, we have been on a very long and beautiful journey. we have added and expanded the scope of mutual cooperation in defence and strategic areas. we are working with renewed trust in areas of new and emerging technologies. we are resolving long pending and difficult issues in trade. live now to our correspondent in washington samira hussain. hello to you. v
level of detail, who would your mone be on? ., ., ., money be on? i would go with elon musk. money be on? i would go with elon musk- here s money be on? i would go with elon musk. here s why, money be on? i would go with elon musk. here s why, elon money be on? i would go with elon musk. here s why, elon musk- money be on? i would go with elon musk. here s why, elon musk bet l musk. here s why, elon musk bet on himself musk. here s why, elon musk bet on himself and musk. here s why, elon musk bet on himself and he bets to win. same ruestion, himself and he bets to win. same question, paul? himself and he bets to win. same question, paul? definitely- himself and he bets to win. same question, paul? definitely mark. question, paul? definitely mark zuckerberg. question, paul? definitely mark zuckerberg, he question, paul? definitely mark zuckerberg, he has question, paul? definitely mark zuckerberg, he has more - question, paul? definitely markl zuckerberg, he has more mar
they are managing it jujitsu of managing the economy. i think it s steered toward 2010. tackling it as an income and, quality issue including the minimum wage, they have to prevent the democrats from pretending all of this has happened as if it s a tsunami or happened under the gop. the result of democratic policies is long-term unemployment, a terrible recovery, and all of this is would indicate that what you have to do is to change the policies and not put on all the band-aids. that s how you win that second argument about income and equality. we thought we d give you the bing highlights early tonight, save our last block for something special. democrats disagreed while republicans agreed with steve that republicans are making a practical deficit argument but are being wimpy. approval was lower from men than women when it was said democrats could pay for pay-fors, they