trying to let it go away but they re trying to bring it back up, and that s my biggest problem. it wasn t even a cleve argument that tucker carlson made we have heard this from some cookie house republicans before, this wasn t a big deal i don t know who you are tryin to convinced that this wasn t big deal, other than people wh only live in that sort of medi bubble on the right or peopl who are die hard for donal trump. you just look silly trying t say that this was not a bi deal maybe worse than silly you look craven in some ways but at the end of the day yeah this is not going away it s still front and center fo a long time, and if your position as a party that thi was okay, look, what happene with these videos, the rea risk here, i don t think his security i think it s a propaganda. it s convincing people that yo can continue to do more stuf like this and this was okay. it just immense a party that cannot be taken seriously.
can continue to do more stuf like this and this was okay. it just cements a party that cannot be taken seriously. and at some point you need leaders to step in and say marjorie taylor greene isn t setting the agenda for us an we need to act like adults indeed. brandon, i know that being her on friday night on st. patrick s day is not how you thought you would be spendin this day or this evening, and deeply appreciate your tim tonight. have a pint on me, my friend absolutely. thank you. thanks for your time. we will be right back. get directv with a two year price guarantee.
they are capable o inaugurating a bank run in a way that other banks with more diverse or diffuse holdings ar not as vulnerable to they are. look, it s 90% tech. they r all telling each other - i think they precipitated a ru on their own bank. they did. look it s a california bank as opposed to a national bank there s no diversificatio requirements that s another requirement and no diversification, no just industry, but they had to many large accounts. so when people, big accoun holders are withdrawing, that causing the rem. one of the things i noticed and we ve seen this with - and j. d. vance in the wake of east palestine, which is to say, okay, you guys want to tal about all this cultural stuf and make your villains let s call to question the material is. vance and brown have introduce that would app of safety rules and regulations.
it s so that he is likely goin to face charges. trump is holding with hi attorneys this week. do we know anything about that meeting and next to you on the legal stuff? lisa knows illegal stuf better than i do the question for him is to you testify as he s been invited i think that seems unlikely. never have any times he took the fifth amendment in tha other case in new york during one deposition. he doesn t seem likely to go forward in front of rancheri this point remember what s really interesting about this case. this case was done this case was investigated and done under - nobody was going to be chargin the former president at that point. two years went by after he lef office when he was no longer i any way immune from prosecutio and nobody decided to do it. the prosecutor said had to pic it up again. you don t pick up a case and g back to a grand jury unles you re planning to indict. that seems like a logica possibility here i think you have to assume, think his lawyers are a
police officers, with a lot of military leaders our report is really important and tells a comprehensive stor but all of this other stuf that we felt like it was important to put before th american people so that ther could be further discussio about law enforcement, socia media, about everything. there is nothing hinder, is no sort of something that was kep from the american people because we showed our work my guess is when they get into those files and they see tha you know, it will reinforce ou core findings. i am not here to talk abou politics, i don t understand the politics of it on the facts, i welcome an further review of our work > yeah so listen, this nex question may come out of the blue than if you don t understand politics but i aske the trying to explain it to me marjorie taylor greene and james calmer, they are going t the jails. they want to go to the jail in d.c. and visit with those wh have been accused of answe actionable behavior. why? i don t, no good question