were a lot of very important discussions that americans who were paying attention heard about all of these important issues. but the reality is, back to the original question that you asked me, sort of political policy discussion that is going on over there has been in a lot of ways eaten up by the back and forth and to ing and fro ing that continue in washington about his agenda among members of his party. so if he wanted the white house spotlight on directly what he was doing, he didn t get it fully and that is because of the fact his agenda hangs in the balance here in washington. so much at stake right now. i m going to be speaking later here in the situation room with the former vice president al gore who won a nobel prize back in 2007 for his work on
to them. but because we re so used to in the last five years presidents to ing and fro ing will i or won t you, will people go for subpoenas or not, the notion of holding somebody like steve bannon in contempt of congress is rare, is very rare, and the reason is because people like steve bannon used to, people who were associated with presidents and others, understand and respect the confines or at least the construct of what the constitution says which is congress wants to talk to you, you should go talk because that s your duty. and yet in the current environment even members of congress say oh, wait a minute, the ones not in power right now, we ll see if they got power back, might have a different back and one of the reasons the ban thon thing is know important, what were his conversations with the then president of the united states and when were his conversations with people around trump and with the organizers of the rally? someone else who has critical
In Plato’s Symposium (189–190 AD), Aristophanes displays knowledge of an ancient myth of the androgyne, according to which our original nature was by no means the same as it is now.
the bbc understands that the british prime minister, borisjohnson, and his australian counterpart, scott morrison, have agreed the broad terms of a trade deal between the two countries. a formal announcement is expected today about what would be the first trade deal to be negotiated from scratch since the uk left the european union. let s discuss this with shaimaa khalil, our correspondent in sydney. there has been a lot of to ing and fro ing to get to this point. what do we know about the deal? this point. what do we know about the deal? that s right. this deal about the deal? that s right. this deal has about the deal? that s right. this deal has been about the deal? that s right. this deal has been talked - this deal has been talked about, i am sure, this deal has been talked about, iam sure, in this deal has been talked about, i am sure, in australia and the uk, as well as quite significantly, the g7. now that two leaders within the same room, around the same dinner table, qu
dana, before we get to the comments from former chief of staff john kelly, senator lisa murkowski, republican of alaska, one of the possible votes in favor of more witnesses, just made an interesting remark about bolton. what did she have to say? she said the following. she said, quote, i think bolton probably has something to offer us. that is murkowski talking to some of our colleagues in the hallways here. she s making her way to the senate chamber. that is significant because there has been a lot of to-ing and fro-ing about witnesses in general, about bolton. this is the furthest she has leaned into the notion of voting yes to call john bolton as a witness, because as we ve been talking about, it would be and will be a vote to make that happen. and, jake, the fact this is coming on the backdrop of the president s former chief of staff saying not just that he believes john bolton but he thinks john bolton should testify is interesting, because