which is more cruel and unusual? one of the most influential appellate courts erupted in public disagreement over one of the most difficult issues of our time, homelessness. having recently decided matters of affirmative action, student loans and adoption, on top of last year s rulings concerning abortion, guns, religion and climate change, scotus might soon have the final word here, too. at issue, ordinances in grants pass, oregon, which would impose fines on homeless people for encampment on public property. a trial court was faced with this issue, whether cities can impose criminal penalties for sitting, sleeping or lying outside on public property for homeless individuals who cannot obtain shelter. it held the ordinances were unconstitutional and constituted cruel and unusual punishment under the eighth amendment. the matter came before the powerful ninth circuit court, which has jurisdiction for much of the western united states and all of california. the ninth circuit
Declaration page with no reason. there s another article that documents this. the tech companies, i don t know exactly the government role in this, but i can say the tech companies definitely de-boosted the signal around the declaration. but shortly after we wrote it, we had an e-mail from the head of the nih telling tony fauci there should be a devastating takedown of the premises of the declaration calling me a fringe epidemiologist. the government played a big role in this censorship effort to create this illusion there was a consensus around their policies, when there wasn t. i read an essay that said this opinion is a huge blow to vital government efforts to harden u.s. democracy against the threats of misinformation. you would say what to them? i mean, the best way to combat misinformation is by real, true speech.
Is it underway? collins also called the scientists and doctors that signed a fringe epidemiologist. passing some articles that debunked the great barrington deck relation. one from wired titled there is no another from nation with the headline focus protection, herd immunity, and other deadly delusions. collins was asked about the email exchange yesterday and he says he stands by his. this is before we had vaccines. and basically, i will call them fringe epidemiologist who really did not have the credentials to be making such a grand and sweeping statement were saying just what the virus run through the population and eventually then everybody will have had and it will be okay. hundreds of thousands of people would have died if we had followed that strategy. he wrote another email to dr. fauci on october 13th with a link to a washington post article. he is quoted in with a headline stating that the declaration
I don t see anything like that yet. is underway? collins called scientists and doctors who signed the declaration fringe epidemiologist, fauci responded with articles that debunked the great barrington declaration, one from wired title there is no scientific divide overheard immunity. another article from the nation with the headline selfish protection, immunity and other deadly delusions. when asked about the email exchange, the city stands by it. this is before we had vaccines and basically i will call them fringe epidemiologist who did not have the credentials to make such a grand sweeping statement reducing just let the virus run through the population and eventually everyone will