Latest Breaking News On - Freeing slaves - Page 7 : comparemela.com

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20140410:20:41:00

fell from it were out of military necessity. they did this not because he was a bleeding heart but he realized to beat the south you had to destroy their property and destroying their property meant freeing slaves. it s like the republican party knows it has a problem with women and minorities and every single time you bring up the question of skin color, they go back hundreds of years to lincoln and they re like, wait, what s that you say we have a problem with black people? what about abe lincoln? abe lincoln was long ago and it s the thing that conservative return to. to echo what jamelle s saying, lincoln is response ebl f responsible for theestan existef the federal government. they like to think of him as the father of the republican party, when it comes to the specific thing, which is that he we think well of him as american people. it s not even that he freed slaves so much. it s they re trying to piggy back on the fact that people

Bleeding heartFreeing slavesMilitary necessityAbraham lincolnSkin colorTheestan existef the federal government

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20100828:03:45:00

in 1860, were americans worried? what is it we have guaranteed citizenship. bill: native americans being tossed off their land. it was not native americans. native americans were excluded from the 14th amendment. it was all about reconstruction. freeing slaves. this multi cull tie rainbow coalition brand new. it wasn t like americans were upset that dead beats could slip into the country and start collecting welfare. we didn t have welfare then. it was all part of reconstruction to get an amendment add to the constitution a big step. this whole anchor baby comes from a footnote that was not related to the opinion, in an opinion by justice brennan in 1982. bill: it will be very hard. it is not in the constitution. bill: i think it s impossible now to get that anchor baby thing to be illegal because you would have to get they would tie it to the 14th. then it would have to go to the supreme court. is it part of the amendment or not? look, whether this is done by legislati

Native americans14th amendmentBrand newIt wasnt like americansFreeing slavesRainbow coalitionAnchor babyAmendment addConstitutiona big stepJustice brennanAnchor baby thingIt partI dont care aboutSupreme court

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20100828:10:45:00

sense. americans must be sitting back thinking what when they thinking in 1860, were americans worried? what is it we have guaranteed citizenship. bill: native americans being tossed off their land. it was not native americans. native americans were excluded from the 14th amendment. it was all about reconstruction. freeing slaves. this multi cull tie rainbow coalition brand new. it wasn t like americans were upset that dead beats could slip into the country and start collecting welfare. we didn t have welfare then. it was all part of reconstruction to get an amendment add to the constitution a big step. this whole anchor baby comes from a footnote that was not related to the opinion, in an opinion by justice brennan in 1982. bill: it will be very hard. it is not in the constitution. bill: i think it s impossible now to get that anchor baby thing to be illegal because you would have to get they would tie it to the 14th. then it would have to go to the supreme court. is it

Native americans14th amendmentBrand newIt wasnt like americansFreeing slavesRainbow coalitionAnchor babyAmendment addConstitutiona big stepJustice brennanAnchor baby thingIt partSupreme court

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20100828:00:45:00

in 1860, were americans worried? what is it we have guaranteed citizenship. bill: native americans being tossed off their land. it was not native americans. native americans were excluded from the 14th amendment. it was all about reconstruction. freeing slaves. this multi cull tie rainbow coalition brand new. it wasn t like americans were upset that dead beats could slip into the country and start collecting welfare. we didn t have welfare then. it was all part of reconstruction to get an amendment add to the constitution a big step. this whole anchor baby comes from a footnote that was not related to the opinion, in an opinion by justice brennan in 1982. bill: it will be very hard. it is not in the constitution. bill: i think it s impossible now to get that anchor baby thing to be illegal because you would have to get they would tie it to the 14th. then it would have to go to the supreme court. is it part of the amendment or not? look, whether this is done by legislati

Native americans14th amendmentBrand newIt wasnt like americansFreeing slavesRainbow coalitionAnchor babyAmendment addConstitutiona big stepJustice brennanAnchor baby thingIt partI dont care aboutSupreme court

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20110415:15:20:15

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20110415:15:20:15
comparemela.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from comparemela.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

Income taxesFreeing slavesEmancipation dayTax codeFiling deadlinesT fall on saturdaysHaley marieTax checkAlison kosikNew york stock exchange