attention to his newly minted political brand. he noound ruined the 49ers. not because of politics, i don t care about. that he disrespected the fans by making the game about him. he put himself before the team. the fans. the owner who pays him. colin is to blame, not the owners. look, the five is a show where the five inspect political opinions. what if i announced on the five i want to play football on the set while everybody else talks? it s reverse, colin, i would be gone in minutes. colin was applauded by many in the media for his risktaking. but what did he really risk in his waning years nothing much. my prediction, he ll land a book deal, ghost writer, honorary position at evergreen college and maybe be on bill maher. maybe that s what he wanted all along.
attention to his newly minted political brand. he noound ruined the 49ers. not because of politics, i don t care about. that he disrespected the fans by making the game about him. he put himself before the team. the fans. the owner who pays him. colin is to blame, not the owners. look, the five is a show where the five inspect political opinions. what if i announced on the five i want to play football on the set while everybody else talks? it s reverse, colin, i would be gone in minutes. colin was applauded by many in the media for his risktaking. but what did he really risk in his waning years nothing much. my prediction, he ll land a book deal, ghost writer, honorary position at evergreen college and maybe be on bill maher. maybe that s what he wanted all along. you re a 49er fan, kimberly.
in 1860, were americans worried? what is it we have guaranteed citizenship. bill: native americans being tossed off their land. it was not native americans. native americans were excluded from the 14th amendment. it was all about reconstruction. freeing slaves. this multi cull tie rainbow coalition brand new. it wasn t like americans were upset that dead beats could slip into the country and start collecting welfare. we didn t have welfare then. it was all part of reconstruction to get an amendment add to the constitution a big step. this whole anchor baby comes from a footnote that was not related to the opinion, in an opinion by justice brennan in 1982. bill: it will be very hard. it is not in the constitution. bill: i think it s impossible now to get that anchor baby thing to be illegal because you would have to get they would tie it to the 14th. then it would have to go to the supreme court. is it part of the amendment or not? look, whether this is done by legislati
legislatively or bypassing an amendment, i don t care about. i do care about being lied to about what the 14th amendment says. and that is a lie. bill: let s get into they can argue about what to do the 14th amendment was not to give rights to citizens. full grown freed slaves right to citizens. americans were enraged that the south after we fight a civil war are still not treating blacks as citizens. that s what the 14th amendment was. we do owe blacks, we do not owe the entire world. bill: going forward, i think it s almost impossible to get this anchor babies thing out of there. i can t see it happening. well, i don t know. maybe we could get harry reid to write a law. bill: he did and it went down. reid tried in 93. . no 93 it wasn t a problem it is today. bill: no, no. that s true. opposite side of the fence. we needed the ford foundation to spend some time getting illegal immigrants to come across the border and apply for welfare. now it is a crisis for a count
in 1860, were americans worried? what is it we have guaranteed citizenship. bill: native americans being tossed off their land. it was not native americans. native americans were excluded from the 14th amendment. it was all about reconstruction. freeing slaves. this multi cull tie rainbow coalition brand new. it wasn t like americans were upset that dead beats could slip into the country and start collecting welfare. we didn t have welfare then. it was all part of reconstruction to get an amendment add to the constitution a big step. this whole anchor baby comes from a footnote that was not related to the opinion, in an opinion by justice brennan in 1982. bill: it will be very hard. it is not in the constitution. bill: i think it s impossible now to get that anchor baby thing to be illegal because you would have to get they would tie it to the 14th. then it would have to go to the supreme court. is it part of the amendment or not? look, whether this is done by legislati