Now, betty ford. This is about 90 minutes. Being ladylike does not require silence. Why should my husband or yours prevent us from being ourselves. I do not believe that being first lady should prevent me from expressing my ideas. [applause] betty ford spoke her mind. Prochoice and a supporter of the equal rights amendment, she and president ford expressed her experience with breast cancer. Through much of her familys public life, she struggled with drug and alcohol dependency. Confronting it defined her post white house years. Tonight, we will tell you the story of elizabeth ford, the wife of our 38 president , gerald ford. For the next 90 minutes to tell her story is Richard Norton smith. He is one of our academic advisors for this whole project and he has helped launch a number of president ial libraries, among them the library for the forts. You bring that to the table. In the interest of full disclosure, i try to be as objective as possible but i was very fortunate to become good
Being ladylike does not require silence. Yoursould my husband or prevent us from being ourselves. I do not believe that being first lady should prevent me from expressing my ideas. [applause] betty ford spoke her mind. Prochoice and a supporter of the equal rights amendment, she herpresident ford expressed experience with breast cancer. Through much of her familys public life, she struggled with drug and alcohol dependency. Confronting it defined her post white house years. We will tell you the story of elizabeth ford, the wife of our 38 president , gerald ford. For the next 90 minutes to tell her story is Richard Norton smith. He is one of our academic advisors for this whole project and he has helped launch a number of president ial libraries, among them the library for the forts. You bring that to the table. In the interest of full disclosure, i try to be as objective as possible but i was very fortunate to become good friends with both of the fort. We want to start tonight story wi
Roosevelt would find whichever seat was comfortable for her. She did not have an assigned a seat at this table. This is the bedroom that franklin and eleanor shared as adults. 1918, when infidelity was discovered within the marriage. From that point on, mrs. Roosevelt insisted on not sharing the same bed with Franklin Roosevelt. At that time, mrs. Roosevelt chose a bad room right next to and it has a doorway coming right in. This was an area where she could eat by herself. It was this was an area where she could be by herself. It was a bit of a private space. The furniture in this room was used by mrs. Roosevelt, one of the fear areas where she could get privacy. When they were both here, it was given they would vote here in the big house. If for some reason franklin was not at hyde park, mrs. Roosevelt was spentr own her time a couple short miles away from the site. Thehis direction we have entrance to sara delano roosevelts room, sandwiched sarah and her husband franklin, the same as
With the full dna. You are saying that california can take that dna, hold it in only look atand the john dna, but they have it in their custody, and there is a marylandecause versus king. By law, california can only look at discrete portions of identification dna. That is it, nothing else. Whats wrong with the proposal by ms. Haskell recognizing what king does restrict, to simply say go to the Supreme Court decision, it talks about a valid arrest supported by probable cause. Says we cancouncil draw the line with a judicial determination of probable cause and therefore am a free reign under the california statute. What is wrong with that line in terms of did interpreting how king applies to this case . Nothat interpretation would be consistent with king, which recognizes that the identification information am a whether it is fingerprints, photographs, or dna, informs the charging decision. Scalia role does justice how would this respond to . Udge mcewens for whatever reason, they got it