hillary or bill or conyers or franken, don t worry, when you get caught we will cover for you. sean: what should happen in the franken case have you evidence. have you an admission although not on everything. in conyers case he says no and moore s case he says didn t happen? ideally the elite must police itself. you have to leave. you must show have you moral fiber or you must resign or sacked from your positions if there is a legal case to be made that should be investigated until the end of the tria trail whether they are republicans or democrats. sean: tax bill we have 30 seconds. is it going to pass and do you have any faith it will pass? i give it a 50/50 shot. if they don t realize if the g.o.p. establishment doesn t vealize their necks are on the line if this doesn t
because in 2005, the u.s. supreme court overturned the obstruction of justice conviction in a 9-0 unanimous ruling. but that s not the only example of wiseman s aggressive tactics resulting in a case being overturned. the conviction of a business transaction between enron and merrill lynch, it sent people to jail. it was also reversed by the fifth u.s. circuit of appeals. now, critics have also accused wiseman of intimidating witnesses, creating crimes that don t even exist. in one case, in particular, one case withholding evidence that was exculpatory that would have helped the defendant. and just like mueller, wiseman is also tied to this corrupt uranium one deal and the ensuing coverup. wiseman ran the doj s fraud section during the russian bribery scheme and gregg jarrett noticed that his name, his signature are on the bottom of the plea agreement that was signed by the russian businessman involved in that case. so why in god s name was
your son. it s extortion. it s bribely. when they do it it s legal. when you and i do it it s i will real. it s got to stop. sean: sydney, last word, do you agree with all of that. i do agree with that he indicted andrew wife. he put young enron treasurer ben in solitary confinement until he was ready to cooperate. evidence will do anything to gte people to say what he wants them to say and then he will prove the case with hearsay. that s why there are always conspiracy charges. we are not seeing mission creep, sean. we are seeing creeps on a mission to tee stabilize and destroy this president. sean: i have two copies of your book coming. thanks to my friend gregg jarrett. we will read it in full. we will continue to do this investigation. it s scary what they re describing. when we come back, of the president calls senator elizabeth warren pocahontas today.
i think a number of these dras want to be able to have consistency when they call for roy moore to get out of the race or when they attack president trump. if they don t call for their own members to do the same or have some form of punishment, they can be accused of hypocrisy. i think that s one of the reasons you re seeing more democrats come out against members of hair own party. i think they re struggling to figure out what is the proper response to an allegation. is it the death penalty immediately call for the person s resignations? ? the underlying facts matter, the severity of what the offense is. senator menendez was in a corruption trial and no democrats asked him to step down. so i think the franken case, i think a lot of democrats are trying to figure out what is the severity of the underlying allegations are there. some people think that maybe the punishment should have been more
they were a u.s. senator. i think that s a brilliant analysis. and then democrat or republican could potentially be expelled at the same time, which would also keep the if you want to be cynical about it, you could be cynical about it. but it was sort of surprising that immediately mitch mcconnell came out and said ethics committee, ethics committee. and, you know, the wheels turn in mitch mcconnell s head. and, you know, you know that was where it was headed. and clearly if roy moore were to win, he would be in the ethics committee and then they would have to do something and they would have to decide, take it to the floor and decide whether he ought to be expelled. and that would put more pressure on the franken case, obviously. all right. something else has happened in the last few minutes as we ve been out here talking which is gill i brand had an interview with the new york times where she was asked directly about former bill clinton and his behavior, some of which he was