Education. Why one college provides aid only to the students who are most in need. Franklin and marshall was a Terrible College when it came to economic diversity, they recognized it, and were shamed. Decided that they were going to do better. Ifill all that and more on tonights pbs newshour. Major funding for the pbs newshour has been provided by moving our economy for 160 years. Bnsf, the engine that connects us. Supported by the john d. And catherine t. Macarthur foundation. Committed to building a more just, verdant and peaceful world. More information at macfound. Org and with the ongoing support of these institutions this program was made possible by the corporation for public broadcasting. And by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. Thank you. Woodruff wall street got the shakes today as developments in the u. S. And abroad sowed doubts. The Federal Reserve gave out mixed signals on raising Interest Rates next month, Chinese Markets were hit by wild swings an
Why one college provides aid only to the students who are most in need. Franklin and marshall was a Terrible College when it came to economic diversity, they recognized it, and were shamed. Decided that they were going to do better. Ifill all that and more on tonights pbs newshour. Major funding for the pbs newshour has been provided by moving our economy for 160 years. Bnsf, the engine that connects us. Supported by the john d. And catherine t. Macarthur foundation. Committed to building a more just, verdant and peaceful world. More information at macfound. Org and with the ongoing support of these institutions this program was made possible by the corporation for public broadcasting. And by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. Thank you. Woodruff wall street got the shakes today as developments in the u. S. And abroad sowed doubts. The Federal Reserve gave out mixed signals on raising Interest Rates next month, Chinese Markets were hit by wild swings and oil price
that s a ton of questions. host: gracious to us. thanks for your time. guest: thank you. pleasure to be here. . . [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2011] [captioning performed by national captioning institute] today, a look at the house members debate on whether to eliminate funding to national public radio. then a look of the american transportation association on budget priorities. then a discussion on the tsa security project. the likely gop candidate on the economy, and whether he will run for the republican nomination. i put my toe in the water. the feedback we ve gotten from people across the country is that tens of thousands are willing to volunteer. this sunday. you are watching c-span, bringing you politics and public affairs. every morning, it is washington journal. weekdays, watched live coverage of the u.s. house. weeknights, congressional hearings and policy forms. also, supreme court s oral arguments. on the weekends, you can see ou
i m happy to have anyone if you answered. i am thrilled to see my former colleague here. now i get to ask you all of this. just kidding. we did not do talk. i am happy to answer. we face the risk of the great depression. it is noted by many economists and other. it is all the government interventions. it was coordinated. it was powerful. it was swift. they all recognize that. elizabeth warren had plenty of criticisms of how to get there. she said it was obvious. she said we would have been back in the stone age. the panel never channel been answered. when you face the situation, they put it there. i think the kitchen sink, too. i think the figure out whether t.a.r.p. stop specific themes. this would have brubeck the grapes of wrath. panel agreed that t.a.r.p. and a bunch of other things really did stop the panic and keep us from a complete meltdown. the poinsettia number of negative things. the government is getting involved. and is not a sippers that perception of realit
larger institutions have cheaper access to credit and a better ability to spread the cost of additional regulation among the larger economy to scale. my smaller banks are disadvantaged. congress responded by providing money to large institutions. there is a consequence in places like kansas for community banks. if the criteria we still to take accounts other consequences of this legislation. it fails to take into account, was there a better way to do it than we did? could there be a greater return? i have heard several talk about the savings and loan bail out. that was the criterion which we are judging success today. this is better, we will lose less money than we did them. i wonder about was that not a better example where we were able to reap return and prohibit investors from getting a return as well? one o the things that is a consequence of tarp is that those invested in these constitute institutions, they were held a lot less accountable for theirnvestments tha