unanimously stands in support of its president. one week ago her testimony over calls for jewish genocide and anti-semitism on her campus generated fiery outrage. this is the faulkner focus. i m sandra smith is nor harris. claudine gay has faced calls to resign that came after she hedged on whether calls for genocide violate her school s code of conduct of harassment and bullying. fox told the meetings stretched late into the late. the board said our extensive deliberations affirm our confidence that president gay is the right leader to help our community heal and address societal issues we re facing. it notes she apologized. the controversy erupted after she was pressed by new york republican elise stefanik. do you believe that type of hateful speech is contrary to harvard s code of conduct or is it allowed at harvard? it is at odds with the values of harvard. can you not say it s against the code of conduct at harvard? we embrace a commitment to free expression ev
state? we already know they got the ability to rub elbows with people in the clinton orbit. and i guarantee you while some of those companies were motivated by doing good, some of them were motivated by at least also doing well. we have two different quid pro quos or two different blurring of the lines. the one at the state department that we re all talking about and we ll see one of these days, we ll find out if there ever was a quid pro quo. we certainly have here, though, is on the foundation side, the use of the foundation to make hundreds of millions of dollar dprz the clintons. now, i wonder, is the attorney general of new york going to shut the clinton foundation down like he shut the trump foundation down? i mean, which from what i have seen, i think the trump foundation probably needed to be shut down. but those are just nickels and dimes compared to the money here. they re using this foundation and bragging about using this foundation to make the clintons hundreds of millio
blurring of the lines, we got one of the state department and we ll see one of these days, we ll find out if there ever was a quid pro quo. on the foundation side, the use of foundation to make hundreds of millions of dollars for the clinton. i wonder, is the attorney general of new york going to shut the clinton foundation down like he shut the trump foundation down? from what i ve seen, the trump foundation needed to be shut down. those are just nickel and dimes compared to the money here. they re bragging about using this foundation to make the clintons hundreds of millions of dollars. shouldn t the attorney general of new york launch an investigation and at least shut down the foundation like they did with the trump foundation. there s so much more money
likely to see smoking guns emerge is actually the foundation side of things. the connections between lobbying and state department at the same time you were paying bill clinton to give a speech, that sort of thing. that s the kind of connection the media will tease out more and more in the komting months. let s talk about the other side. the gop has a massive field. i think there s 49 people who are in the race. fact check tour e that s a little high. is it? something like that. a high number. the debate planning discussion says we don t want everybody on the stage. that s counter productive they are going to cut some people out. do you think that s good for the gop to cut some people out of the conversation? they at least have enough to play back and forth in a basketball game at this point. indeed. you could have a baseball game in a few months it feels like even. football. ultimate frisbee. that s more of the weekend conversation. they are going to have real
the thing i don t like, $8,000 to $9,000 per event and trying to raise $300,000. the money will be on stuff you haven t done yet. that s a risky bet. i m hearing you need it for investing in marketing. that s like throwing money in the fire if the marketing doesn t work out. a couple things that i thought were powerful. i ve had a former princeton linebacker working as an intern for me. his work ethic, that link between discipline around athletics and in the workplace really worked for me. another thing i liked about what you re doing, there s a social aspect to who the mission offers. i know, dan, you ve got a foundation side where you re doing things to help athlete on the foundation side of the business. i think linking that to the business side, that will appeal to some investors that want to see more than return on investment and doing good for the community. did the pitch get you? would you take another meeting? yeah. how about you? i definitely would. good job, guys.