Me all my fault. Fault. All right, all right. All righ t. Happy wednesday, everybody. So tomorrow, both president joes biden and former President Donald Trump heaidendt to the Texas Border To Duke ito out on americas current migrandut crisis. The sad part is only one of them will know wherely one he i the other will think hes on a beach in delaware during cinco de mayo. S part the bidens part, this, is only the second time hes been to the border during his presidencyn to. The other time it was to pick up a package for a Hunter Marked baby powdera pa. Baby of course, trump has beenght] to the border numerous times and its obvious why hes been talking about it for years. It just tookor years for everyoe to catch up. The truth is that trump that terribleto Catch Dragging Vulgae who are Chattering Classes love to hatrriblee, has once again sn that he has the pulse of america far better than is ea opponent who at this point may not have a pulse himself. Pulse and i know too far or far enoug
Speaking, breathing, eye problems, or Muscle Weakness may be a sign of a lifethreatening condition. Do not receive botox® cosmetic if you have a skin infection. Side effects may include allergic reactions, injection site pain, headache, eyebrow, Eyelid Drooping and eyelid swelling. Tell your doctor about your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, and medications, including botulinum toxins, as these may increase the risk of serious side effects. See for yourself at botoxcosmetic. Com. Im daniel lurie as and ive spent my careerisk of fighting poverty,cts. Helping people right here in san francisco. Im also a father raising two kids in the city. Deeply concerned that city hall is allowing crime and lawlessness to spread. Now we can do something about it by voting yes on prop e. A common sense solution that ensures we use Community Safety cameras to catch Repeat Offenders and hold them accountable. Vote yes on e. Good evening, once again im stephanie ruhle. Welcome back to our spe
suggest that. is there any evidence to suggest that the presidency was what they were focused on? there is some evidence of that. there were people saying we don t want jefferson davis to be elected president and there was also one of the drafts of section 3 specifically mentioned the presidency and the vice president. but it wasn t the final enactment. right. it wasn t the final enactment, but it shows there was some concern about some people about confederate insurrectionists ascending to the presidency. we look at the historical evidence and pick the evidence we like and interpret is tan den shally because you can throw this counterveiling evidence back in our face. we wanted to focus on the text of the constitution, this was a compromised provision that was enacted in section 3. let me ask you another question about the states. you have forcefully made an argument about the states not being able to enforce section 3, so if we agree with you on that, what happens
Stephanie ruhle, all here for msnbcs special coverage of these Court Arguments on the disqualification of donald trump. Welcome to our Primetime Recap of the historic proceedings that the United States Supreme Court. I am Rachel Maddow at msnbc home base along with my beloved colleagues, Lawrence Odonnell, and joy reid, and chris hayes, happy to have you all here. No cameras are allowed in federal courtrooms, including the United States Supreme Court, but today, for the arguments about whether china for having an insurrection against the u. S. Government, the justices did allow for the sound of the proceedings, the audio, to be livestreamed here on msnbc, we carried the audio of those Oral Arguments live unfold. That was starting just after 10 am eastern time. But we also know that people have lives, jobs, school, other responsibilities and might make it hard to take two hours out of a thursday to stare at an Audio Speaker for hours trying to figure out of that was gorsuch, or a Leader
that argument. there is some evidence to suggest that. any evidence to suggest the presidency was what they were focused on? there is some evidence of that. people saying we don t want jefferson davis to be elected president and one of the drafts of section three specifically mentioned the presidency and vice presidency. it wasn t the final inaction. it wasn t final but there was concern by some people about con federal insurrectionists ascendsing to the presidency. we didn t want to make a a history argument. the other side can come back and throw this counter evidence back in our face. we wanted to focus more on the text of the constitution. it was a compromise provision that was enacted in section three. let me ask you another question about the states because you have forcefully made an argument about the states not being able to enforce section three. so if we agree with you on that, what happens next? i thought you also wanted us to end the litigation so is