pittman, very definitely, in the body of the opinion, it s 113 pages. and above those footnotes, he does all the work that was too hard for the supreme court to do about standing in about injunctive relief and whether the state can sue under. it s the most jargon lawyers speak, and it s very deft. and it s very meticulous. and in these footnotes, like the one you just read, that footnote nine, that just gutted me. that is essentially a slideshow, of all the suffering, that is happened, that was completely cast aside, by the lower court, by the fifth circuit, by the u.s. supreme court. and to give a sense, of the acute catastrophic effect, for millions of texans. in all of that is happening in these footnotes.
Transition au Mali : préserver l aspiration au changement
crisisgroup.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from crisisgroup.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
text structure, history, as reflected in the footnote nine, then it is impermissible, but otherwise, if there is a gap in the interpretations under the chevron doctrine, it is upheld. then when you talked about interpreting the statute, agency rule making. ordinarily it will be in agency rule making, or at least often. and there is an exception, correct? four major cases? what is the exception? for the rules of major economic or social significance, the supreme court has long made clear that the deference to the agency s will not apply in those cases. we expect congress, in the words of the supreme court, most recently, we expect congress to speak clearly if it wants to assign rule making and issue of
inconsistency between steele s assertion in the existence of the article. apparently to shield mr. steele s credibility on which it still relied for the renewal request of the fisa application. you got to renew it every 90 days. it says, give them of the information contained in a september 23rd news article generally matches the information about page that steele discovered doing his research. to stop for a second. they used the same information from the same person that presented to the court, two separate, yet corroborating pieces of information to put emphasis to the court, c, we ve got two sources. the only problem is, the source of the yahoo news article the same source of the dossier, the same guy who didn t want trump to win in the same guy that was being paid by the clinton campaign. this is so corrupt. here is what is on page four.e, i got it right here, all of us, right here. in footnote nine of its