veterans, and anytime we are wrecked an additional barrier to the box, what we are saying is that we want fewer of these people to be able to have their voices heard. that is why i am proud of my state of new mexico, we continue to move forward, continue to expand access to the ballot box in my state, we are an oasis in this country for voting rights, and that is not the truth everywhere, and the reality is that we are not going to have a fair and equitable voting system in this country until most footers in this country preferably, all, can have the same access to the ballot box. that s why i m so proud to be part of this group of candidates running for secretary of state. and myself running for reelection and many of my colleagues because at the end of the day, we re here to fight for the rights of voters, and we will continue to do that. secretary weber, why do you think republicans want to make it harder to vote for people in this country. in your state, you said you
legislative session. we see it in the teacher shortage. because educators are tired of being vilified, told outright lies to students of our history. this governor footers everything through the lens of his 2024 presidential ambitions. not the needs of florida. so he knows he needs to outflank trump to the extreme right. to do that, he does what extremists do, scapegoats minorities, makes a climate of invading privacy, of censoring, banning books and replacing parents and doctors with politicians. there is no trust this information is being taken for the right reason, stored in a manner that is responsible. you have parents telling their daughters, when you go to the doctor, don t talk about menstrual cycle, don t give them that information. because we fear that will be weaponized to turn you into a criminal for seeking attention. nadine, there s been pushback from the lgbtq+
you don t mean redacted, you mean the label was crossed out. the actual label. right. they go through, they cross out secret, no foreign, on the headers and footers throughout the document as well as the label. and on that notion of tracking, by the way, when you talk about that, there are some documents, i think, that are included where it was noted to have this return to some form of a person whose job it was to bring it back to the original source of information in terms of the agency. is that pretty standard, and why would those folders still be with the president? well, for context, the president doesn t get long documents. generally, for example, a president s daily brief is usually one page. it comes with a package that the briefer has with all sorts of other background and details and even anticipated questions that the president might ask. the president gets a very streamlined version supported by briefs, like powerpoints, if you would, story boards and such like that.
had the authority to do so, but had any of those documents been declassified that they would have been blocked out or crossed out, as you can go online and find it declassified documents. you don t mean redacted, you mean the label would have been crossed out in some way, you would have known. the actual label. they go through and cross out secret, on the headers, and footers, throughout the document and the label. on the notion of tracking, when you talk about that, there are some documents, i think, included where it was noted to have this return to some person whose job it was to bring it back to the original source of information in terms of the agency. is that standard, and why would those folders still be with the president? well, for context, the president does not get wrong documents. for example, the president s daily brief is usually one page. it comes with a package that the briefer has that has background and details and usually anticipated questions
getting us to the espionage statute. the references are national defense information. that is a subset of classified information. not all classified information is national defense information. not only is it sensitive but it goes toward the defense of the united states. incredibly sensitive. number two, we see references to probable cause to believe that evidence of obstruction will be found if we get to search this place. that means that perhaps someone, a source, a witness has said, hey. if you look here, you re going to see evidence of attempts to mask, screw up your case, change things. i have seen in my experience, i ve seen government employees white out the classified headers and footers on documents. i ve seen them destroy documents if they think someone is coming for a search. someone has indicated to the government, somehow, that you ll