over a dozen, and it s good to have that broad perspective from another prosecutor. something else she is likely to do, focus on georgia. jack smith had a national focus , one nationwide defendants, so i m expecting a broader case and want focusing on the state of georgia. listen, there are a lot of steps to these, but when we look to the special counsel s case at this point, the filing defense lawyers have to respond to today deals with how do you protect, against the former president from revealing in his public comments and social media posts , evidence that is shared from the prosecution of the defense in what is called discovery, some of which is sensitive in this case? what does the judge consider with a decision like this, and what is a judge s power to keep that kind of evidence from getting out there? jim, the judge does have broad powers to do what we call
was beyond recklessness but her splits full. their intense standards in the criminal. i think there s ample evidence that president trump group of others at a very specific intent to obstruct that joint session. that was more than reckless. you think is maybe as words on the ellipse were reckless, speaking to an angry mob that he knew was armed, at least some of the people in that crowd were armed. but the whole course of dealing beyond the speech itself to the multi part plan to disrupt the joint session, that s more than reckless, that s intention. at least i believe that s what the evidence that we found show, that is the crucial question for jack smith. panel, please stick around to gallop more to discuss. we re gonna take a quick break. afterwards we are going to take a focus on georgia where a fourth indictment might soon await donald trump. don t go away. don t go away. rn on everything with just one card. chase freedom unlimited. so, if you re off the racking. .or crab cracki
conduct rise to criminality. i think select committee found was beyond recklessness but purposeful. there are intense standards in the criminal. i think there s ample evidence that president trump group of others at a very specific intent to obstruct that joint session. that was more than reckless. you think is maybe as words on the ellipse were reckless, speaking to an angry mob that he knew was armed, at least some of the people in that crowd were armed. but the whole course of dealing beyond the speech itself to the multi part plan to disrupt the joint session, that s more than reckless, that s intention. at least i believe that s what the evidence that we found show, that is the crucial question for jack smith. panel, please stick around to gallop more to discuss. we re gonna take a quick break. afterwards we are going to take a focus on georgia where a fourth indictment might soon await donald trump. don t go away. than detergent alone. if you want laundry to smell fresh for wee
president not only has cases spanning from florida to georgia to new york, but these are really serious claims, and so whether or not he will be indicted doesn t seem to matter to his base, though, ayman. many people don t know what indictment means. many don t care. and as long as they think he s going to give them tax breaks or build his wall or continue to take away rights and freedoms of people of color and women of color across the country, they re fine with it. so this is political theater for them. tim, based on your work with the january 6th committee and what we know from news reports, what do you think is the possibility that we ll see another trump indictment in this georgia case specifically? i think it s almost a certainty, ayman, that there will be an indictment very early in the spring of 2021. they were already assembling a
the southern district of florida. however, the two outstanding that you showed, the election interference and then fulton county, georgia, district attorney fawny willis s investigation, they re both serious in terms of time served and consequences. you look at it in terms of f what trump tried to do and how narrowly he almost got away with it. what about the trials going on at the same time? he has demonstrated he s able to spin everything to his advantage and certainly he can fund-raise off the back of these, but can it politically work for him as well? i think so, ayman. he ll be the victim and hero of