pathway, and that can be an afterschool program or a team or band, but if there s no pathway, it s easy to go in the wrong direction. and then a gang or something can look appealing to some kids. that s why in my education plan, the focus on after school. the idea that three more hours a day the kids are going to be in a safe and secure place learning. arguments and culture. these are kids in 6th, 7th, 8th grade. exactly that make or break point. and if we give them those positive alternatives, most kids will take them. and i only kind of have a very weak tired analogy of the stop and frisk, these massive nets that they go trolling fortunia and they catch all of the other fish and say tough, it s collateral damage. those types of policies are just lazy. there s a hadder work that you
direction and then a gang or something can look appealing to some kids. that s why, look. in my education plan, the focus on after school, idea that for three more hours a day kids in a safe, secure place learning, being engaged, arts and culture, the thing that is will engage them in addition to homework, help, tutoring, exactly in the make or break point and if we give them the positive alternatives, most kids will take them. if you don t, what described take them. the stop and frisk thing, i have a weak, tired analogy. the massive nets going trawling for tuna with and catch the other fish and say, tough, it s collateral damage. i find that those policymakers are just lazy. there s a harder work you to do in order to balance being tough on crime and balancing people s democratic freedoms that requires more effort, more work. and it seems like in our society