Citizens united is by far the biggest there. Upcoming case will be another one, the listing rules for aris. And potentially some Court Watchers believe, he could not down the benefits given to candidates and parties themselves. So, the Citizens United is the most highprofile decision on this issue, but very much in a string of cases and we do not know how this is going to and yet either. Marianne from tennessee on our line for independents. Good morning. Caller good morning. I have a question about dark money. When the representatives who are supposed to be representing us shut down the government over obamacare, the stock market went down. Resumed, iternment went up the same day. Since these representatives get a heads up on the market movements, how many of them made money, who were they, and how much . Host andy kroll. Guest that is a good question. That gives back to what the previous color said about the stock act. There is absolutely the for them to act on information they have a
About her perspective of where we are on cyber, and she work for the Bush Administration and the obama administration, and core author of the comprehensive National Cybersecurity initiative, which many of you are familiar with, and her plea, what she talked about was shes been at this since 2008, like many of us, and shes been kind of taken aback by the lack of an International Strategy that the United States seems to be pursuing, and i think its intriguing to hear what you have to say, what you guys think as a group. You raised the i. T. Issue, sort of like the quiet negotiations that jims been involved with, but what do you, as a group see, as the best mods model for an international set of standards, norms for Convention Heading towards as part of the information sharing. If youre a fortune 25, youre acting all over the world under a range of information sharing issues, not just the United States. Curious to see what the brain power on the panel thinks. I hope you look at the cyber
National captioning institute] committee. Performed by national captioning institute] [captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2013] the circumstances that led to this tragedy are multidimensional. Many issues raised by the tragedy such as the accuracy of our gun laws and the quality of our Mental Health care are outside the purview of this committee. As we have learned more about aaron alexis, a number of my colleagues and i have been asking each other why a troubled unstable individual possessed a security clearance from the United States government. Why was he originally granted a security clearance when he did not disclose his arrest record on his application . Why did the investigator responsible for looking into that arrest write up that alexis had, quote, retaliated by deflating someones tires instead of disclosing that alexis had shot those tires . We also wonder how such violence could have taken place in the navy yard which is more secure than just about any workpla
And we will start with general alexander, would there be any arm sources and methods of i am notchange . Familiar with this. Not that i know of. Least, the way you have described it, giving access to the committee on certain things, it is our intent, any time we see something significant like that, to report it to the committee. It seems to me they have a different window a better window on what is going on, and anything they see as an issue should be shared with us. So if there need to be changes made, we could do that. Mr. Cole . Congressman, think the real issue comes down to what is in the application, what is in order, what is in the filing in the fisa court, and that may implicate sources and methods, and the nature of that disclosure is going to be unique to each different document that we are talking about. Ways for us to keep them classified, not allowed them to be public from the things of that nature, we are the Intelligence Committee. I understand that. Number of fisa a ord
Its not conditioned on you becoming obese i know that the sugary industry they dont like talking about diabetes and dont dispute that those drinks can give you diabetes but try to ignore diabetes and talk about obesity im sure its very group tested there is so some causes of obesity and genetics and exercise and they try to make it when obesity but its about diabetes. My understanding is that in terms of increasing ones risk for diabetes its not contingent on being over weight and you can have sugary drink consumption have a increase in diabetes even if youre not over weight arrest the asian population shows they get diabetes at a lower bmi its not related to over weight. So taking accuses from the Tobacco Industry we know that the sugar lobby was work in the 50s to destroy or undermine the science that sugar is not about obesity. They continue to have influence and in 2000 they were able to keep the warning soft on the added sugar to limit sugar in instead of decrease and theyve also