security clearance. but former senior intelligence officials signed a let speaking out saying, we feel compelled to respond in the wake of the ill-considered and unprecedented remarks and actions by the white house regarding the removal of john brennan s security clearances. we all agree that the president s actions regarding brennan and the threats of similar actions against other former officials has nothing to do with who should and who should not hold security clearances and everything to do with an attempt to stifle free speech. you don t have to agree with what brennan says, and, again, not all of us do, to agree with his right to say it subject to his obligation to protect classified information. well, this after former navy admiral william mccraven, who oversaw the raid that killed osama bin laudden wrote a lette challenging the president to revoke his clearance as well. what are republicans saying
do the right thing when sitting in judgment and not sort of act as loyal vas sills to the white house. i guess the question is how much is that faith preserved at this particular moment in american governance? it s a great question. there s an irony. if they do it and get away it, it would be in large part because of the institutional prestige the court has developed over the years like u.s. versus nixon where they did the right thing and that would permit them to get away with it. one quick point. if there were an attempt to delay things, the push bang eeld immediately would be oh, my god the supreme court can t function with eight people. in the past justices when they ve stepped down have done it subject to the confirmation of their successors. not kennedy. he s done at the end of july. so any effort to use this as a delay will fall. it s ironic because of course,
society and conservatives but they re people of integrity. tuck fundamentally trust them to do the right thing when sitting in judgment and not sort of act as loyal vas sills to the white house. i guess the question is how much is that faith preserved at this particular moment in american governance? it s a great question. there s an irony. if they do it and get away it, it would be in large part because of the institutional prestige the court has developed over the years like u.s. versus nixon where they did the right thing and that would permit them to get away with it. one quick point. if there were an attempt to delay things, the push bang eeld immediately would be oh, my god the supreme court can t function with eight people. in the past justices when they ve stepped down have done it subject to the confirmation of their successors. not kennedy. he s done at the end of july. so any effort to use this as a
donald trump has conducted himself. he talked about how, even if it s not unconstitutional, public officials should be careful of how they express themselves. it had a good deal for the president the president should be held in check as well. absolutely. his vote is the one that gave trump the victory, i thought it should suggest i don t want to pretend i know what going on about retirement. it subject . when we come back an important investigation in the runner investigation. police the russi police. plus, the russian pop star at the trump tower meeting releasing a video that seeps to be controlling the president. you got to see this. oh, you brought butch. yeah! (butch growls at man) he s looking at me right now, isn t he? yup.
the president, but we re more convinced as we see it that this is a rigged investigation u. think that mueller probe is legitimate? i not anymore. i don t. i did when i came in. joining me now, white house reporter for the daily beast and daniel goldman, former assistant u.s. attorney for the southern district. also in the control room, they want me to do my drum roll but i won t subject to you that. instead, i want you to help me understand this tweet. i don t get it. the young and beautiful lives. who is he talking about? in the, in parentheses, and others, omd aare there old and p deprep decredit lives i just don t know about? i think it s not right to describe michael flynn as old